Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23972073›Full record

ArticleExpert review of medical devices2013

Considerations on the development of a model of kidney bioengineering and regeneration in rats.

Andrea Peloso, Ravi Katari, Timil Patel, Sij Hemal, Joao Paulo Zambon, Marcus Salvatori, Giuseppe Orlando

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of medical devices, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in the Knowledge about Kidney Decellularization and Repopulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  3. Urovision 2020: The future of urology.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  4. Nanotechnology in Urology.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea PelosoWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Ravi Katari
Timil Patel
Sij Hemal
Joao Paulo Zambon
Marcus Salvatori
Giuseppe Orlando
Wake Forest University · USNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of: Song JJ, Guyette JP, Gilpin SE, Gonzalez G, Vacanti JP, Ott HC. Regeneration and experimental orthotopic transplantation of a bioengineered kidney. Nat. Med. 19(5), 646-51 (2013). Emergent technologies of regenerative medicine have shown immense potential to overcome the limitations of organ transplantation by supplying tissues and organs bioengineered ex vivo in the laboratory. So far, clinical translation has been possible for simple, hollow organs, whereas the bioengineering and regeneration of complex modular organs (namely, kidneys, hearts, livers, lungs and small bowel) remains far from our grasp. In the case of the kidney, the bioengineering and regeneration of renal organoids requires a supporting scaffold that approximates the biochemical, spatial and vascular relationships of the native kidney extracellular matrix. A recent report describes the use of rodent kidneys to generate whole organ, three-dimensional scaffolds. These scaffolds were subsequently seeded with rat neonatal kidney cells to reconstitute the parenchymal cell compartment and with human umbilical venous endothelial cells to reconstitute the endothelium and allow implantation. Once assembled and allowed to mature in bioreactors, the so-obtained constructs were able to exert some function peculiar to the kidney both in vitro and in vivo after implantation in rodents. In this invited commentary, we will address the most critical topics of organ regeneration starting from the above-mentioned experience with the kidney but eventually embracing the whole field of complex modular organs bioengineering.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKidneyKidney TransplantationMaleTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID23972073
OpenAlexW2003723191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.