Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23971971›Full record

SynthesisDiagnostic pathology2013

Association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 22,475 subjects.

Zhaoguo Xu, Li Yu, Xiaoye Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diagnostic pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Assessment of the association between hOGG1 C8069G polymorphism and colorectal cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Does tea consumption correlate to risk of fracture? A meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhaoguo XuDepartment of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang 110003, China. zhaoguo_xu@126.com.
Li Yu
Xiaoye Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Ser326Cys polymorphism in the human 8-oxogunaine glycosylase (hOGG1) gene with lung cancer susceptibility had been investigated, but results were inconsistent and underpowered. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the association of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with risk of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsRelevant studies were identified through a search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) using terms "lung cancer", "hOGG1" or "OGG1", "polymorphism" or "variation" and the last search updated on May 1, 2013. In this meta-analysis, we assessed 30 published studies involving 22,475 subjects that investigated the association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility.

resultsOverall, the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism was not associated with lung cancer susceptibility in different genetic models (dominant model comparison: OR = 0.133; 95% CI = 0.111-0.161; P(heterogeneity) = 0.000), and recessive model: OR = 0.543; 95% CI = 0.399-0.739; P(heterogeneity) = 0.000). Similarly, in the stratified analyses by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found among Asians for homozygote comparison (OR = 0.850; 95% CI = 0.732 0.986; P(heterogeneity) = 0.064), and dominant model (OR = 0.160; 95% CI = 0.137-0.187; P(heterogeneity) = 0.001), and Caucasians for dominant model (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.03-1.77; P(heterogeneity) = 0.015), and recessive model (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.03-1.77; P(heterogeneity) = 0.015). In population-based populations, marginally significant increased risks were found in dominant model (OR = 0.143; 95% CI = 0.111 0.184; P(heterogeneity) = 0.000) and recessive model (OR = 0.429; 95% CI = 0.261-0.705; P(heterogeneity) = 0.000). We also found a significant difference between hOGG1 Ser326Cys genotype and lung cancer susceptibility in studies with hospital-based controls for homozygote model (OR = 0.798; 95% CI = 0.649-0.982; P(heterogeneity )= 0.007),dominant model (OR = 0.122; 95% CI = 0.091-0.163; P(heterogeneity) = 0.000).

conclusionOur data showed that the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism contributed to the risk of lung cancer. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3842531131031605.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticChi-Square DistributionDNA GlycosylasesGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansLung NeoplasmsOdds RatioPhenotypeRacial GroupsRisk FactorsSerineDNA Glycosylasesoxoguanine glycosylase 1, humanSerine

Identifiers

PMID23971971
PMCPMC3853705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.