ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2013
Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation of xylanase-producing yeastFood science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Development of a RobustMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Enhancing xylose-fermentation capacity of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by multistep evolutionary engineering in inhibitor-rich lignocellulose hydrolysate.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- PKA regulatory subunit Bcy1 couples growth, lipid metabolism, and fermentation during anaerobic xylose growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Assessment of the TRX2p-yEGFP Biosensor to Monitor the Redox Response of an Industrial Xylose-FermentingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of an industrial yeast strain for efficient production of 2,3-butanediol.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Synthetic acid stress-tolerance modules improve growth robustness and lysine productivity of industrial Escherichia coli in fermentation at low pH.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Principles and practice of designing microbial biocatalysts for fuel and chemical production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
- Blocking Mitophagy Does Not Significantly Improve Fuel Ethanol Production in Bioethanol Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Identification of the major fermentation inhibitors of recombinant 2G yeasts in diverse lignocellulose hydrolysates.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Article
- Repeated batches as a strategy for high 2G ethanol production from undetoxified hemicellulose hydrolysate using immobilized cells of recombinantBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020Article
- Transcriptional Changes in the Xylose Operon inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Biofuel production from straw hydrolysates: current achievements and perspectives.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Xylose fermentation efficiency of industrialBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
- PKA and HOG signaling contribute separable roles to anaerobic xylose fermentation in yeast engineered for biofuel production.PloS one · 2019Article
- Engineering of Pentose Transport inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- A transcriptome analysis of the ameliorate effect of Cyclocarya paliurus triterpenoids on ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2018Article
- Inactivation of the transcription factor mig1 (YGL035C) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves tolerance towards monocarboxylic weak acids: acetic, formic and levulinic acid.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2018Article
- Second-Generation Bioethanol from Coconut Husk.BioMed research international · 2018Review
- An artificial transport metabolon facilitates improved substrate utilization in yeast.Nature chemical biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn addition to efficient pentose utilization, high inhibitor tolerance is a key trait required in any organism used for economically viable industrial bioethanol production with lignocellulose biomass. Although recent work has succeeded in establishing efficient xylose fermentation in robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, the resulting strains still lacked sufficient inhibitor tolerance for efficient sugar fermentation in lignocellulose hydrolysates. The aim of the present work was to combine high xylose fermentation activity and high inhibitor tolerance in a single industrial yeast strain.
resultsWe have screened 580 yeast strains for high inhibitor tolerance using undetoxified acid-pretreated spruce hydrolysate and identified a triploid industrial baker's yeast strain as having the highest inhibitor tolerance. From this strain, a mating competent diploid segregant with even higher inhibitor tolerance was obtained. It was crossed with the recently developed D-xylose fermenting diploid industrial strain GS1.11-26, with the Ethanol Red genetic background. Screening of 819 diploid segregants from the tetraploid hybrid resulted in two strains, GSF335 and GSF767, combining high inhibitor tolerance and efficient xylose fermentation. In a parallel approach, meiotic recombination of GS1.11-26 with a haploid segregant of Ethanol Red and screening of 104 segregants resulted in a similar inhibitor tolerant diploid strain, GSE16. The three superior strains exhibited significantly improved tolerance to inhibitors in spruce hydrolysate, higher glucose consumption rates, higher aerobic growth rates and higher maximal ethanol accumulation capacity in very-high gravity fermentation, compared to GS1.11-26. In complex medium, the D-xylose utilization rate by the three superior strains ranged from 0.36 to 0.67 g/g DW/h, which was lower than that of GS1.11-26 (1.10 g/g DW/h). On the other hand, in batch fermentation of undetoxified acid-pretreated spruce hydrolysate, the three superior strains showed comparable D-xylose utilization rates as GS1.11-26, probably because of their higher inhibitor tolerance. They produced up to 23% more ethanol compared to Ethanol Red.
conclusionsWe have successfully constructed three superior industrial S. cerevisiae strains that combine efficient D-xylose utilization with high inhibitor tolerance. Since the background strain Ethanol Red has a proven record of successful industrial application, the three new superior strains have strong potential for direct application in industrial bioethanol production.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.