ArticleObesity facts2013
Screening for co-morbidity in 65,397 obese pediatric patients from Germany, Austria and Switzerland: adherence to guidelines improved from the year 2000 to 2010.
Article in Obesity facts, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to analyze the adherence to current guidelines for co-morbidity screening in overweight and obese pediatric patients participating in the Adipositas-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (APV) initiative in three German-speaking countries.
methodsAPV database: 181 centers from Germany, Austria and Switzerland, specialized in obesity care, contributed standardized, anonymous data of medical examinations from 65,397 patients performed between 2000 and 2010. Completeness of screening for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose metabolism was analyzed using adjusted means.
resultsMean age of the cohort was 12.5 ± 2.9 years and 46.5% were male. 17.3% were overweight (>90th-97th percentile), 45.1% obese (>97th-99.5th percentile), and 37.7% extremely obese (>99.5th percentile). In 2000, blood pressure was documented for 55.1% of patients, increasing to 88.7% in 2010. The rate of lipid diagnostics also improved from 45.0 to 67.7%, and screening for diabetes rose from 32.7 to 62.3% in the same time period. Blood pressure measurements were performed more often during inpatient care (88.5%) compared to outpatient programs (77.5%). Screening was more complete with increasing age and increasing degree of obesity. In boys screening rate was higher than in girls.
conclusionDuring the 11-year period, screening for co-morbidity improved significantly in overweight or obese children and adolescents. However, adherence to guidelines is still insufficient in some institutions. Quality control based on benchmarking may improve obesity care and outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.