Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23969135›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

DNorm: disease name normalization with pairwise learning to rank.

Robert Leaman, Rezarta Islamaj Dogan, Zhiyong Lu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 498 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Semantics-enabled biomedical literature analytics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. OncoCTMiner: streamlining precision oncology trial matching via molecular profile analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert LeamanNational Center for Biotechnology Information, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, 13212 East Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Rezarta Islamaj Dogan
Zhiyong Lu
Arizona State University · USNational Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationDespite the central role of diseases in biomedical research, there have been much fewer attempts to automatically determine which diseases are mentioned in a text-the task of disease name normalization (DNorm)-compared with other normalization tasks in biomedical text mining research.

methodsIn this article we introduce the first machine learning approach for DNorm, using the NCBI disease corpus and the MEDIC vocabulary, which combines MeSH® and OMIM. Our method is a high-performing and mathematically principled framework for learning similarities between mentions and concept names directly from training data. The technique is based on pairwise learning to rank, which has not previously been applied to the normalization task but has proven successful in large optimization problems for information retrieval.

resultsWe compare our method with several techniques based on lexical normalization and matching, MetaMap and Lucene. Our algorithm achieves 0.782 micro-averaged F-measure and 0.809 macro-averaged F-measure, an increase over the highest performing baseline method of 0.121 and 0.098, respectively. AVAILABILITY: The source code for DNorm is available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Lu/Demo/DNorm, along with a web-based demonstration and links to the NCBI disease corpus. Results on PubMed abstracts are available in PubTator: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Lu/Demo/PubTator .

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData MiningDiseaseTerminology as TopicAlgorithmsHumansInternetPubMedVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID23969135
PMCPMC3810844
OpenAlexW2142016317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.