Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23968617›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2012

Inequity in access to guideline-recommended colorectal cancer treatment in Nova Scotia, Canada.

André R Maddison, Yukiko Asada, Robin Urquhart, Grace Johnston, Frederick Burge, Geoff Porter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrating equity indicators for hospital reporting metrics.Research in health services & regions · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André R MaddisonGraduate Student, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Yukiko Asada
Robin Urquhart
Grace Johnston
Frederick Burge
Geoff Porter

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer continues to be one of the heaviest burdens of disease in Canada, and assessing potential inequities in access to cancer care may serve as a barometer of the health of Canadian health systems. This study tackled three limitations of the current literature by clearly differentiating between inequality and inequity, by assessing inequity in receipt of care and wait times for care, and by taking advantage of inequity indices to enhance comparability of inequities between studies and populations. We measured income-, age-, sex- and distance-related inequities among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Nova Scotia by accounting for clinical guidelines and patient need. Results reveal statistically significant inequity in access to chemotherapy and radiotherapy for CRC by age, sex and distance, but not income. This study demonstrates the importance of carefully examining inequity in access to cancer care and highlights one method to report and compare inequities with conceptual clarity.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNova ScotiaRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23968617
PMCPMC3517874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.