Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23968498›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Comparing single-site with multisite rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus - clinical effects and neuroscientific insights: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Astrid Lehner, Martin Schecklmann, Peter M Kreuzer, Timm B Poeppl, Rainer Rupprecht, Berthold Langguth

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01663324 nacompletednot on this map

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: Optimization by Stimulation of the Cortical Tinnitus Network

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RegensburgRan2012 to 2015Enrolled50ConditionsChronic TinnitusArmsrTMS intervention 1, rTMS intervention 2
NCT03425045 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Subjective Non-Pulsatile Primary Tinnitus Compared to Placebo and Medicament Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2015 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsTinnitus, SubjectiveArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Sham stimulation, Ginkgo Biloba Extract
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of chronic tinnitus.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of cortical stimulation in neuropathic pain, tinnitus, depression, and movement disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Astrid LehnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstraße 84, Regensburg 93053, Germany. Astrid.Lehner@medbo.de
Martin Schecklmann
Peter M Kreuzer
Timm B Poeppl
Rainer Rupprecht
Berthold Langguth
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral years ago, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the auditory cortex has been introduced as a treatment approach for chronic tinnitus. Even if this treatment is beneficial for a subgroup of patients, the overall effects are limited. This limitation may be due to the fact that the auditory cortex is only one of several brain areas involved in tinnitus. Whereas auditory areas are considered to code for tinnitus loudness, conscious perception of and attention allocation to tinnitus is supposed to be reflected by network activity involving frontal and parietal cortical areas. The aim of the present study is to influence this frontoparietal network more efficiently by perturbing the most important nodes with rTMS. METHODS/

designThis is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients receive rTMS treatment on 10 consecutive working days using either the multisite rTMS protocol (left dorsolateral prefrontal, 1,000 stimuli, 20 Hz; left temporoparietal, 1,000 stimuli, 1 Hz; right temporoparietal stimulation, 1,000 stimuli, 1 Hz) or a single-site protocol (unilateral stimulation of the temporoparietal cortex, 3,000 stimuli, 1 Hz). Individuals aged 18 to 70 years with chronic tinnitus ≥6-month duration and a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score ≥38 are recruited for the study. A total of 50 patients are needed to detect a clinical relevant change of tinnitus severity (α = 0.05; 1 - β = 0.80). Primary outcome measures are the change in the Tinnitus Questionnaire score from baseline to the end of treatment as well as the number of treatment responders as defined by a reduction in the Tinnitus Questionnaire score of ≥5 points. Furthermore, changes in brain structure and activity are assessed using (functional) magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography in the resting state. Those measurements are also performed in 25 healthy control subjects. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to reveal whether network stimulation is superior to single-site stimulation in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. Furthermore, the comparison between tinnitus patients and healthy controls and the longitudinal effects of both rTMS treatment protocols on brain structure and function allow inferences to be made about the neural correlates of tinnitus.

trial registrationClinical Trials: NCT01663324.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseClinical ProtocolsDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFrontal LobeGermanyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID23968498
PMCPMC3765439
OpenAlexW1996281061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.