Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23968494›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2013

Quantifying the mosquito's sweet tooth: modelling the effectiveness of attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) for malaria vector control.

John M Marshall, Michael T White, Azra C Ghani, Yosef Schlein, Gunter C Muller, John C Beier

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04149119 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait Phase III Trial in Mali

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Clinical Research Center, MaliRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,100ConditionsVector TransmissionArmsAttractive Target Sugar Baits (ATSB)
NCT05219565 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase III, Open-label, Community-based, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Cost-effectiveness, and Acceptability of Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSB) for Malaria Burden Reduction in Western Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,962ConditionsMalariaArmsAttractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Science advances · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John M MarshallDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Imperial College London, London, UK. john.marshall@imperial.ac.uk.
Michael T White
Azra C Ghani
Yosef Schlein
Gunter C Muller
John C Beier
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600719Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent vector control strategies focus largely on indoor measures, such as long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS); however mosquitoes frequently feed on sugar sources outdoors, inviting the possibility of novel control strategies. Attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB), either sprayed on vegetation or provided in outdoor bait stations, have been shown to significantly reduce mosquito densities in these settings.

methodsSimple models of mosquito sugar-feeding behaviour were fitted to data from an ATSB field trial in Mali and used to estimate sugar-feeding rates and the potential of ATSB to control mosquito populations. The model and fitted parameters were then incorporated into a larger integrated vector management (IVM) model to assess the potential contribution of ATSB to future IVM programmes.

resultsIn the Mali experimental setting, the model suggests that about half of female mosquitoes fed on ATSB solution per day, dying within several hours of ingesting the toxin. Using a model incorporating the number of gonotrophic cycles completed by female mosquitoes, a higher sugar-feeding rate was estimated for younger mosquitoes than for older mosquitoes. Extending this model to incorporate other vector control interventions suggests that an IVM programme based on both ATSB and LLINs may substantially reduce mosquito density and survival rates in this setting, thereby substantially reducing parasite transmission. This is predicted to exceed the impact of LLINs in combination with IRS provided ATSB feeding rates are 50% or more of Mali experimental levels. In addition, ATSB is predicted to be particularly effective against Anopheles arabiensis, which is relatively exophilic and therefore less affected by IRS and LLINs.

conclusionsThese results suggest that high coverage with a combination of LLINs and ATSB could result in substantial reductions in malaria transmission in this setting. Further field studies of ATSB in other settings are needed to assess the potential of ATSB as a component in future IVM malaria control strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesCarbohydratesEntomologyFemaleInsecticidesMalariaMaleMaliModels, StatisticalMosquito ControlPheromonesCarbohydratesinsect attractantsInsecticidesPheromones

Identifiers

PMID23968494
PMCPMC3765557
OpenAlexW2140921815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.