Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23967279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Reciprocal activation of transcription factors underlies the dichotomy between proliferation and invasion of glioma cells.

Harshil D Dhruv, Wendy S McDonough Winslow, Brock Armstrong, Serdar Tuncali, Jenny Eschbacher, Kerri Kislin, Joseph C Loftus, Nhan L Tran, Michael E Berens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Protein kinase CCell reports · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Collective invasion of glioma cells through OCT1 signalling and interaction with reactive astrocytes after surgery.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Tumor Cell Invasion in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harshil D DhruvTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Wendy S McDonough Winslow
Brock Armstrong
Serdar Tuncali
Jenny Eschbacher
Kerri Kislin
Joseph C Loftus
Nhan L Tran
Michael E Berens
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center · US

Funding

Targeted MV-CEA as a Potent Antitumor Agent against GBMP50CA108961 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI O'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICK · 2004 to 2015
$22.5M
Targeting the Fn14-Rac1 signaling pathway in invasive gliomasR01CA130940 · NCI · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI TRAN, NHAN L · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108961NCI NIH HHS R01 CA130940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histology of malignant glioma depicts dense proliferative areas rich in angiogenesis as well as dissemination of neoplastic cells into adjacent brain tissue. Although the mechanisms that trigger transition from proliferative to invasive phenotypes are complex, the dichotomy of cell proliferation and migration, the "Go or Grow" hypothesis, argues for specific and coordinated regulation of these phenotypes. We investigated transcriptional elements that accompany the phenotypes of migration and proliferation, and consider the therapeutic significance of the "Go or Grow" hypothesis. Interrogation of matched core and rim regions from human glioblastoma biopsy specimens in situ (n = 44) revealed higher proliferation (Ki67 labeling index) in cells residing at the core compared to the rim. Profiling activated transcription factors in a panel of migration-activated versus migration-restricted GBM cells portrayed strong NF-κB activity in the migratory cell population. In contrast, increased c-Myc activity was found in migration-restricted proliferative cells. Validation of transcriptional activity by NF-κB- or c-Myc-driven GFP or RFP, respectively, showed an increased NF-κB activity in the active migrating cells, whereas the proliferative, migration restricted cells displayed increased c-Myc activity. Immunohistochemistry on clinical specimens validated a robust phosphorylated c-Myc staining in tumor cells at the core, whereas increased phosphorylated NF-κB staining was detected in the invasive tumor cells at the rim. Functional genomics revealed that depletion of c-Myc expression by siRNA oligonucleotides reduced cell proliferation in vitro, but surprisingly, cell migration was enhanced significantly. Conversely, inhibition of NF-κB by pharmacological inhibitors, SN50 or BAY-11, decreased both cell migration in vitro and invasion ex vivo. Notably, inhibition of NF-κB was found to have no effect on the proliferation rate of glioma cells. These findings suggest that the reciprocal and coordinated suppression/activation of transcription factors, such as c-Myc and NF-κB may underlie the shift of glioma cells from a "growing-to-going" phenotype.

Indexed as

Transcriptional ActivationCell CycleCell MovementCell ProliferationCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Knockdown TechniquesGlioblastomaGliomaHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenNeoplasm InvasivenessNF-kappa BProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA, MessengerKi-67 AntigenNF-kappa BProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23967279
PMCPMC3744529
OpenAlexW2025677699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.