ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013
Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the neural effects of typicality and predictability for face and object stimuli.PloS one · 2024Article
- Varying sex and identity of faces affects face categorization differently in humans and computational models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Face dissimilarity judgments are predicted by representational distance in morphable and image-computable models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- A nonverbal route to conceptual knowledge involving the right anterior temporal lobe.Neuropsychologia · 2018Article
- Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A specialized face-processing model inspired by the organization of monkey face patches explains several face-specific phenomena observed in humans.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Integration or separation in the processing of facial properties--a computational view.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The Invariance Hypothesis Implies Domain-Specific Regions in Visual Cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Invariant visual object recognition: biologically plausible approaches.Biological cybernetics · 2015Article
- On the particular vulnerability of face recognition to aging: a review of three hypotheses.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Review
- Computational modeling of the neural representation of object shape in the primate ventral visual system.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2015Article
- Spontaneous object recognition: a promising approach to the comparative study of memory.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Review
- Own-race and own-species advantages in face perception: a computational view.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Touching on face space: comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2014Article
- Finding and recognizing objects in natural scenes: complementary computations in the dorsal and ventral visual systems.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- Deformation-specific and deformation-invariant visual object recognition: pose vs. identity recognition of people and deforming objects.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- The nature of holistic processing in face and object recognition: current opinions.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our understanding of the mechanisms and neural substrates underlying visual recognition has made considerable progress over the past 30 years. During this period, accumulating evidence has led many scientists to conclude that objects and faces are recognised in fundamentally distinct ways, and in fundamentally distinct cortical areas. In the psychological literature, in particular, this dissociation has led to a palpable disconnect between theories of how we process and represent the two classes of object. This paper follows a trend in part of the recognition literature to try to reconcile what we know about these two forms of recognition by considering the effects of learning. Taking a widely accepted, self-organizing model of object recognition, this paper explains how such a system is affected by repeated exposure to specific stimulus classes. In so doing, it explains how many aspects of recognition generally regarded as unusual to faces (holistic processing, configural processing, sensitivity to inversion, the other-race effect, the prototype effect, etc.) are emergent properties of category-specific learning within such a system. Overall, the paper describes how a single model of recognition learning can and does produce the seemingly very different types of representation associated with faces and objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.