ArticlePLoS genetics2013
A model-based analysis of GC-biased gene conversion in the human and chimpanzee genomes.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interrogating the Regulatory Function of HAQERs during Human Cortical Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Hominoid-specific transposable elements reshaped neural crest migration in craniofacial development.Molecular systems biology · 2025Article
- Comparative genomics sheds light on mammalian and avian gene regulation and phenotypic evolution.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Direct detection of meiotic recombination events in the highly heterozygous amphioxus genome.Advanced biotechnology · 2025Article
- Convergent evolution of noncoding elements associated with short tarsus length in birds.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Innovations in Conserved Regulatory Elements Associate With Developmental Genes in Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- CpG island turnover events predict evolutionary changes in enhancer activity.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Half a Century of Controversy: The Neutralist/Selectionist Debate in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Evolutionary innovation in conserved regulatory elements across the mammalian tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- GC-biased gene conversion drives accelerated evolution of ultraconserved elements in mammalian and avian genomes.Genome research · 2023Article
- Emergence and influence of sequence bias in evolutionarily malleable, mammalian tandem arrays.BMC biology · 2023Article
- High subtelomeric GC content in the genome of a zoonoticMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- Transcription factor binding sites are frequently under accelerated evolution in primates.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Positive selection in noncoding genomic regions of vocal learning birds is associated with genes implicated in vocal learning and speech functions in humans.Genome research · 2021Article
- Article
- Epigenomic profiling of primate lymphoblastoid cell lines reveals the evolutionary patterns of epigenetic activities in gene regulatory architectures.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Divergent genes in gerbils: prevalence, relation to GC-biased substitution, and phenotypic relevance.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- Runaway GC Evolution in Gerbil Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Microsporidia with Vertical Transmission Were Likely Shaped by Nonadaptive Processes.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- WidespreadGenome research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is a recombination-associated process that favors the fixation of G/C alleles over A/T alleles. In mammals, gBGC is hypothesized to contribute to variation in GC content, rapidly evolving sequences, and the fixation of deleterious mutations, but its prevalence and general functional consequences remain poorly understood. gBGC is difficult to incorporate into models of molecular evolution and so far has primarily been studied using summary statistics from genomic comparisons. Here, we introduce a new probabilistic model that captures the joint effects of natural selection and gBGC on nucleotide substitution patterns, while allowing for correlations along the genome in these effects. We implemented our model in a computer program, called phastBias, that can accurately detect gBGC tracts about 1 kilobase or longer in simulated sequence alignments. When applied to real primate genome sequences, phastBias predicts gBGC tracts that cover roughly 0.3% of the human and chimpanzee genomes and account for 1.2% of human-chimpanzee nucleotide differences. These tracts fall in clusters, particularly in subtelomeric regions; they are enriched for recombination hotspots and fast-evolving sequences; and they display an ongoing fixation preference for G and C alleles. They are also significantly enriched for disease-associated polymorphisms, suggesting that they contribute to the fixation of deleterious alleles. The gBGC tracts provide a unique window into historical recombination processes along the human and chimpanzee lineages. They supply additional evidence of long-term conservation of megabase-scale recombination rates accompanied by rapid turnover of hotspots. Together, these findings shed new light on the evolutionary, functional, and disease implications of gBGC. The phastBias program and our predicted tracts are freely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.