Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013
Randomized, controlled, multicenter study of the immunogenicity and safety of a fully liquid combination diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-five-component acellular pertussis (DTaP5), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), and haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine compared with a DTaP3-IPV/Hib vaccine administered at 3, 5, and 12 months of age.
Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00287092 (A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Immunogenicity and Safety of PEDIACEL®, a Combined Diphtheria, Tetanus, Five Component Acellular Pertussis, Inactivated Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Conjugate Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Immunogenicity and Safety of PEDIACEL®, a Combined Diphtheria, Tetanus, Five Component Acellular Pertussis, Inactivated Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Conjugate Vaccine (Adsorbed) Compared To Infanrix®-IPV+Hib When Both Vaccines Are Given to Infants Using a Three Dose Immunisation Schedule ("Nordic Schedule" 3-5-12 Months)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Analysis of the Renal Protective Effect of GLP-1 on Diabetic Patients Based on Edge Detection.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Booster vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria: insufficient protection against diphtheria in young and elderly adults.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2016Article
- Combination vaccines against diarrheal diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the levels of immunogenicity and safety of diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-five-component acellular pertussis (DTaP(5)), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib) and DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib vaccines for study participants 3, 5, and 12 months of age. Post-dose 3 noninferiority criteria comparing DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib to DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib using rates of seroprotection were demonstrated against diphtheria, tetanus, and polio types 1 to 3, but not for polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP). While PRP did not meet noninferiority criteria, the seroprotection rate and geometric mean concentration (GMC) were high, indicating a clinically robust immune response. GMCs or titers for other antigens (including pertussis) and the safety profiles were generally similar between groups. Fully liquid DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib can be administered using the 3-, 5-, and 12-month vaccination schedule. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00287092.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.