ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Detection of influenza H7N9 virus: all molecular tests are not equal.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alternative quadruplex real-time PCR reactions for detection and discrimination ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Surveillance forMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Hunting for mpox (monkeypox) mimickers: Use of the Biofire meningitis/encephalitis panel on lesion swabs to support alternative viral diagnoses.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of COVID-19: facts and challenges.New microbes and new infections · 2020Review
- Real-time PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 detection in Canadian laboratories.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020Article
- Validation of the Seegene RV15 multiplex PCR for the detection of influenza A subtypes and influenza B lineages during national influenza surveillance in hospitalized adults.Journal of medical microbiology · 2020Article
- Detection of enterovirus D68 in Canadian laboratories.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Article
- Assessment of antigen and molecular tests with serial specimens from a patient with influenza A(H7N9) infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Global infectious diseases - the new norm for the United States?Disease-a-month : DM · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent emergence of influenza A virus (H7N9) emphasizes the need for its rapid detection. While commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are commonly used to detect seasonal influenza virus, this study demonstrated that the analytical sensitivity of commercial assays is highly variable compared to that of CDC-based in-house NAATs for the detection of H7N9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.