Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23966338›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2014

Rectal douching and implications for rectal microbicides among populations vulnerable to HIV in South America: a qualitative study.

Jerome T Galea, Janni J Kinsler, John Imrie, César R Nureña, Jorge Sánchez, William E Cunningham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. On-demand microbicide products: design matters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jerome T GaleaFaculty of Population Health, Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, , London, UK.
Janni J Kinsler
John Imrie
César R Nureña
Jorge Sánchez
William E Cunningham

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KITCHEN, SCOTT G · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
The Center for Health Improvement of Minority ElderlyP30AG021684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Homero Erwin del Pino · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
TRAINING COREP20MD000182 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI MILBURN, NORWEETA GERMAINE, SHAPIRO, MARTIN F. · 2002 to 2016
$16.5M
Effectiveness of Peer Navigation to Link Released HIV+ Jail Inmates to HIV CareR01DA030781 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CUNNINGHAM, WILLIAM EMERY · 2010 to 2015
$4.5M
Culturally Sensitive Intervention to Improve Retention in HIV Care for Latino MSMR34MH089719 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CUNNINGHAM, WILLIAM EMERY · 2010 to 2012
$556k
NIAID NIH HHS AI28697NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021684NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030781NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000182NIMHD NIH HHS P20MD000182NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH089719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile gel-formulated rectal microbicides (RM) are the first to enter clinical trials, rectal douching in preparation for anal intercourse is a common practice; thus RMs formulated as douches may be a convenient alternative to gels. Nonetheless, little is known about potential users' thoughts regarding douche-formulated RMs or rectal douching practices, data that is needed to inform the advancement of douche-based RMs. This qualitative study examined thoughts regarding douches, their use as an RM and current douching practices among men who have sex with men and transgender women.

methods12 focus groups and 36 in-depth interviews were conducted (N=140) to examine the overall acceptability of RM, of which one component focused on rectal douching. Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded; text relating to rectal douching was extracted and analysed. Sociodemographic information was collected using a self-administered questionnaire.

resultsSupport for a douche-formulated RM centred on the possibility of combined precoital hygiene and HIV protection, and it was believed that a deeply penetrating liquid douche would confer greater HIV protection than a gel. Drawbacks included rectal dryness, impracticality and portability issues, and potential side effects. Non-commercial douching apparatus use was common and liquids used included detergents, vinegar, bleach, lemon juice and alcohol.

conclusionsA douche-formulated RM, while desirable and perceived as more effective than a gel-formulated RM, also generated questions regarding practicality and side effects. Of immediate concern were the non-commercial liquids already being used that likely damage rectal epithelia, potentially increasing HIV infection risk. Precoital rectal douching is common and an RM formulated as such is desirable, but education on rectal douching practices is needed now.

Indexed as

RectumSexual BehaviorAdultAnti-Infective AgentsEcuadorFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMalePeruQualitative ResearchRiskTherapeutic IrrigationTransgender PersonsAnti-Infective AgentsGAY MENHIVMICROBICIDESPREVENTION

Identifiers

PMID23966338
PMCPMC4035233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.