Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23966244›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2013

Pancreatic β-cell function is a stronger predictor of changes in glycemic control after an aerobic exercise intervention than insulin sensitivity.

Thomas P J Solomon, Steven K Malin, Kristian Karstoft, Sangeeta R Kashyap, Jacob M Haus, John P Kirwan

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. β-Cell function during a high-fat meal in young versus old adults: role of exercise.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tailoring Exercise Prescription for Effective Diabetes Glucose Management.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Metabolic implications of pancreatic fat accumulation.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas P J SolomonPhD, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum Institute 4.5.13, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark. thomas.solomon@sund.ku.dk.
Steven K Malin
Kristian Karstoft
Sangeeta R Kashyap
Jacob M Haus
John P Kirwan

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
TRAINING IN METABOLISMT32DK007319 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNENGRABER, HENRI · 1986 to 2013
$5.0M
Age, Exercise, Diet: Effects on Insulin ResistanceR01AG012834 · NIA · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI KIRWAN, JOHN P. · 2004 to 2008
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NIA NIH HHS R01 AG012834NIA NIH HHS R01 AG12834NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextUnderstanding intersubject variability in glycemic control following exercise training will help individualize treatment.

objectiveOur aim was to determine whether this variability is related to training-induced changes in insulin sensitivity or pancreatic β-cell function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe conducted an observational clinical study of 105 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS AND

main outcome measuresIndividual subject changes in fitness (VO2max), glycemia (glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance test), insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), oral glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), and disposition index (DI) were measured following 12 to 16 weeks of aerobic exercise training. Regression analyses were used to identify relationships between variables.

resultsAfter training, 86% of subjects increased VO2max and lost weight. Glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test were reduced in 69%, 62%, and 68% of subjects, respectively, while insulin sensitivity improved in 90% of the participants. Changes in glycemic control were congruent with changes in GSIS such that 66% of subjects had a reduction in first-phase GSIS, and 46% had reduced second-phase GSIS. Training increased first- and second-phase DI in 83% and 74% of subjects. Training-induced changes in glycemic control were related to changes in GSIS (P < .05), but not insulin sensitivity or DI, and training-induced improvements in glycemic control were largest in subjects with greater pretraining GSIS.

conclusionsIntersubject variability in restoring glycemic control following exercise is explained primarily by changes in insulin secretion. Thus, baseline and training-induced changes in β-cell function may be a key determinant of training-induced improvements in glycemic control.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyAdultBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseFemaleGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInsulin ResistanceInsulin-Secreting CellsMaleObesityTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID23966244
PMCPMC3790622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.