Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23966176›Full record

ArticleProteins2013

Predicting protein-DNA interactions by full search computational docking.

Victoria A Roberts, Michael E Pique, Lynn F Ten Eyck, Sheng Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A human transcription factor in search mode.Nucleic acids research · 2016
    Article
  6. C-Terminal Domain of Integrase Binds between the Two Active Sites.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria A RobertsSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093.
Michael E Pique
Lynn F Ten Eyck
Sheng Li
San Diego Supercomputer Center · USScripps Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Maile Ann Young Karris · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF METALLOENZYMES FOR DNA REPAIRR01GM046312 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI TAINER, JOHN A. · 1991 to 2012
$5.9M
STRUCTURE DRIVEN ANALYSIS OF EBOLA VIRUS RECEPTOR BINDING SITER01AI081982 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SAPHIRE, ERICA OLLMANN · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
Computation and Mass Spec: Predicting Protein ComplexesR01GM070996 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TEN EYCK, LYNN F. · 2004 to 2007
$1.3M
Current Generation Integrated Instrumentation for H-D Exchange LC-MSS10RR029388 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WOODS, VIRGIL L · 2010 to 2010
$1.0M
NCRR NIH HHS RR029388NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029388NIAID NIH HHS AI081982NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIAID NIH HHS P30AI036214NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081982NIGMS NIH HHS GM070996NIGMS NIH HHS GM46312NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046312NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-DNA interactions are essential for many biological processes. X-ray crystallography can provide high-resolution structures, but protein-DNA complexes are difficult to crystallize and typically contain only small DNA fragments. Thus, there is a need for computational methods that can provide useful predictions to give insights into mechanisms and guide the design of new experiments. We used the program DOT, which performs an exhaustive, rigid-body search between two macromolecules, to investigate four diverse protein-DNA interactions. Here, we compare our computational results with subsequent experimental data on related systems. In all cases, the experimental data strongly supported our structural hypotheses from the docking calculations: a mechanism for weak, nonsequence-specific DNA binding by a transcription factor, a large DNA-binding footprint on the surface of the DNA-repair enzyme uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG), viral and host DNA-binding sites on the catalytic domain of HIV integrase, and a three-DNA-contact model of the linker histone bound to the nucleosome. In the case of UNG, the experimental design was based on the DNA-binding surface found by docking, rather than the much smaller surface observed in the crystallographic structure. These comparisons demonstrate that the DOT electrostatic energy gives a good representation of the distinctive electrostatic properties of DNA and DNA-binding proteins. The large, favourably ranked clusters resulting from the dockings identify active sites, map out large DNA-binding sites, and reveal multiple DNA contacts with a protein. Thus, computational docking can not only help to identify protein-DNA interactions in the absence of a crystal structure, but also expand structural understanding beyond known crystallographic structures.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesHIV IntegraseHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingThermodynamicsUracil-DNA GlycosidaseDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesHIV IntegraseUracil-DNA GlycosidaseHIV integrasehydrogen/deuterium exchangelinker histonePoisson-Boltzmann electrostaticsprotein-DNA structuretranscription factoruracil-DNA glycosylase

Identifiers

PMID23966176
PMCPMC4045845
OpenAlexW1496864752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.