Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23966174›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2014

Blood pressure targets in the treatment of high blood pressure: a reappraisal of the J-shaped phenomenon.

F D Fuchs, S C Fuchs

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F D FuchsNational Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS)-CNPq, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
S C FuchsNational Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS)-CNPq, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk that lowering blood pressure (BP) excessively increases the incidence of cardiovascular disease-the J-shaped phenomenon-has been a matter of concern endorsed by many experts, particularly in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes. The results of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes (ACCORD) trial strengthened the idea that it may be futile to lower BP more intensively in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, there seems to be no direct J-shaped relation between BP-lowering treatment and outcome. Patients with normal or low BP and high or very high cardiovascular risk could have their BP reduced further by treatment. Placebo-controlled clinical trials of BP-lowering agents in patients with BP within normal values and concomitant cardiovascular disease demonstrated consistent reduction of recurrent and newer cardiovascular events. The use of BP agents in such conditions, as in patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes and in patients recovered from a stroke has been endorsed by guidelines. Although is likely that there is a J-shaped relationship of BP with outcomes in cohort studies, clinical trials that tested more intensive versus standard goals and clinical trials done with patients with low BP demonstrated that the J-shaped phenomenon should not be a concern in the treatment of high BP.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypertensionPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23966174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.