Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23966167›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2013

Comparison of efficacy of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R and chemotherapy on stem-like and non-stem human pancreatic cancer cells.

Yukihiko Hiroshima, Ming Zhao, Yong Zhang, Ali Maawy, Mohamed K Hassanein, Fuminari Uehara, Shinji Miwa, Shuya Yano, Masashi Momiyama, Atsushi Suetsugu and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Recombinant AttenuatedCancers · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Targeting of pancreatic cancer cells and stromal cells using engineered oncolytic Salmonella typhimurium.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Tumor-targetingHeliyon · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft (PDOX) Models of Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yukihiko HiroshimaAntiCancer, Inc; San Diego, CA USA; Department of Surgery; University of California San Diego; San Diego, CA USA; Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine; Yokohama, Japan.
Ming Zhao
Yong Zhang
Ali Maawy
Mohamed K Hassanein
Fuminari Uehara
Shinji Miwa
Shuya Yano
Masashi Momiyama
Atsushi Suetsugu
Takashi Chishima
Kuniya Tanaka
Michael Bouvet
Itaru Endo
Robert M Hoffman
University of California, San Diego · USYokohama City University · JPAntiCancer (United States) · USGifu University · JP

Funding

Targeted tumoricidal bacteriaR44CA126023 · NCI · ANTICANCER, INC. · PI ZHAO, MING · 2010 to 2011
$761k
Targeted tumoricidal bacteriaR43CA126023 · NCI · ANTICANCER, INC. · PI ZHAO, MING · 2007 to 2007
$150k
NCI NIH HHS CA126023NCI NIH HHS R43 CA126023NCI NIH HHS R44 CA126023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The XPA1 human pancreatic cancer cell line is dimorphic, with spindle stem-like cells and round non-stem cells. We report here the in vitro IC 50 values of stem-like and non-stem XPA1 human pancreatic cells cells for: (1) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), (2) cisplatinum (CDDP), (3) gemcitabine (GEM), and (4) tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R (A1-R). IC 50 values of stem-like XPA1 cells were significantly higher than those of non-stem XPA1 cells for 5-FU (P = 0.007) and CDDP (P = 0.012). In contrast, there was no difference between the efficacy of A1-R on stem-like and non-stem XPA1 cells. In vivo, 5-FU and A1-R significantly reduced the tumor weight of non-stem XPA1 cells (5-FU; P = 0.028; A1-R; P = 0.011). In contrast, only A1-R significantly reduced tumor weight of stem-like XPA1 cells (P = 0.012). The combination A1-R with 5-FU improved the antitumor efficacy compared with 5-FU monotherapy on the stem-like cells (P = 0.004). The results of the present report indicate A1-R is a promising therapy for chemo-resistant pancreatic cancer stem-like cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMiceMice, NudeMicroscopy, ConfocalNeoplastic Stem CellsPancreatic NeoplasmsSalmonella typhimuriumTreatment OutcomeXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agentsamino acid auxotrophychemoresistanceconfocal microscopyfluorescence imagingGFPpancreatic cancerRFPSalmonella typhimuriumselective tumor targetingstem cell

Identifiers

PMID23966167
PMCPMC3899191
OpenAlexW1971432397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.