Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23965967›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2013

Structural properties of polyphenols causing cell cycle arrest at G1 phase in HCT116 human colorectal cancer cell lines.

Soon Young Shin, Hyuk Yoon, Seunghyun Ahn, Dong-Wook Kim, Dong-Ho Bae, Dongsoo Koh, Young Han Lee, Yoongho Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unravelling Potential Health-Beneficial Properties ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anti-Cancer Properties ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soon Young ShinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. shinsy@konkuk.ac.kr
Hyuk Yoon
Seunghyun Ahn
Dong-Wook Kim
Dong-Ho Bae
Dongsoo Koh
Young Han Lee
Yoongho Lim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-derived polyphenols are being tested as chemopreventive agents; some polyphenols arrest the cell cycle at G1 phase, whereas others inhibit cell cycle proliferation at G2/M phase. Therefore, polyphenols have been proposed to inhibit cell cycle progression at different phases via distinct mechanisms. Indeed, our previous studies showed that small structural differences in polyphenols cause large differences in their biological activities; however, the details of the structural properties causing G1 cell cycle arrest remain unknown. In this study, we prepared 27 polyphenols, including eight different scaffolds, to gain insight into the structural conditions that arrest the cell cycle at G1 phase in a quantitative structure-activity relationship study. We used cell cycle profiles to determine the biophores responsible for G1 cell cycle arrest and believe that the biophores identified in this study will help design polyphenols that cause G1 cell cycle arrest.

Indexed as

G1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsAnticarcinogenic AgentsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHCT116 CellsHumansMolecular StructurePlant ExtractsPolyphenolsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAnticarcinogenic AgentsPlant ExtractsPolyphenols

Identifiers

PMID23965967
PMCPMC3759946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.