Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23965660›Full record

ArticleZygote (Cambridge, England)2015

Vitrification of day 3 cleavage-stage embryos yields better clinical outcome in comparison with vitrification of day 2 cleavage-stage embryos.

Fengli Chi, Chengfeng Luo, Ping Yin, Ling Hong, Jingling Ruan, Meiyuan Huang, Tao Duan, Guoqing Tong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Zygote (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fengli ChiIVF Program,Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Chengfeng LuoIVF Program,Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Ping YinIVF Program,Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Ling HongIVF Program,Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Jingling RuanIVF Program,Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Meiyuan HuangIVF Program,Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Tao DuanProfessor and President Shanghai 1st Maternity and Infant Hospital,Medical School of Tongji University,Shanghai 200040,P. R. China. or to Director,Assisted Reproduction Technology Center,Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China201203.
Guoqing TongProfessor and President Shanghai 1st Maternity and Infant Hospital,Medical School of Tongji University,Shanghai 200040,P. R. China. or to Director,Assisted Reproduction Technology Center,Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai,People's Republic of China201203.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine an optimal time point for vitrification of cleavage-stage human embryos. This study included patients who were undergoing day 2 or day 3 vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage embryo transfer at the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Programme of the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, China, affiliated to the Tongji University School of Medicine, from April 2010 to March 2012. Intervention was made for the entire cohort of vitrified embryos for poor responder patients so as to avoid severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Embryo survival rate (SR) after vitrification-warming, implantation rate (IR), and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were the main outcome measurements. In total, 380 vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage embryo transfer (VWT) cycles were included. We found that the SR after vitrification and warming for day 2 embryos and day 3 embryos were 92.7% and 92.8%, respectively. For poor ovarian responders, the IR of day 2 and day 3 vitrified-warmed embryos was 6.4% and 13.2%, respectively (P = 0.186). The CPR for day 3 vitrified-warmed embryos was significantly higher than that of day 2 vitrified-warmed embryos (17.6 vs. 4.0% per transfer cycle, P = 0.036). For patients who had their entire cohort of embryos vitrified to prevent severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), the IR and CPR were not significantly different for day 2 and day 3 vitrified-warmed embryo transfer. In conclusion, for vitrified-warmed embryo transfer, cryopreservation of the entire cohort of embryos on day 3 resulted in better clinical outcomes compared with cryopreservation on day 2. Therefore, it is highly recommended that cleavage-stage embryos should be vitrified on day 3, but not on day 2, particularly for poor ovarian responder patients.

Indexed as

Pregnancy RateVitrificationAbortion, SpontaneousAdultBlastocystCryopreservationEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromePregnancyRetrospective StudiesVitrified–warmed embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID23965660
PMCPMC4413873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.