Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23965490›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2013

External Quality Assessment (EQA) program for the preanalytical and analytical immunohistochemical determination of HER2 in breast cancer: an experience on a regional scale.

Irene Terrenato, Vincenzo Arena, Sara Pizzamiglio, Ilaria Pennacchia, Letizia Perracchio, Simonetta Buglioni, Cristiana Ercolani, Francesca Sperati, Leopoldo Costarelli, Elena Bonanno and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Irene TerrenatoPathology Department, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome, 00144, Italy. mottolese@ifo.it.
Vincenzo Arena
Sara Pizzamiglio
Ilaria Pennacchia
Letizia Perracchio
Simonetta Buglioni
Cristiana Ercolani
Francesca Sperati
Leopoldo Costarelli
Elena Bonanno
Daniela Baldini
Silvia Candia
Anna Crescenzi
Antonella Dal Mas
Claudio Di Cristofano
Vito Gomes
Lucia Rosalba Grillo
Paola Pasquini
Maria Nicoletta Pericoli
Maria Teresa Ramieri
Domenica Di Stefano
Luigi Ruco
Stefania Scarpino
Domenico Vitolo
Giulia d'Amati
Angelo Paradiso
Paolo Verderio
Marcella Mottolese

Funding

Chemical Biology of Caged Garcinia XanthonesR01CA133002 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI THEODORAKIS, EMMANUEL A · 2008 to 2012
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA 133002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn External Quality Assessment (EQA) program was developed to investigate the state of the art of HER2 immunohistochemical determination in breast cancer (BC) in 16 Pathology Departments in the Lazio Region (Italy). This program was implemented through two specific steps to evaluate HER2 staining (step 1) and interpretation (step 2) reproducibility among participants.

methodsThe management activities of this EQA program were assigned to the Coordinating Center (CC), the Revising Centers (RCs) and the Participating Centers (PCs). In step 1, 4 BC sections, selected by RCs, were stained by each PC using their own procedures. In step 2, each PC interpreted HER2 score in 10 BC sections stained by the CC. The concordance pattern was evaluated by using the kappa category-specific statistic and/or the weighted kappa statistic with the corresponding 95% Jackknife confidence interval.

resultsIn step 1, a substantial/almost perfect agreement was reached between the PCs for scores 0 and 3+ whereas a moderate and fair agreement was observed for scores 1+ and 2+, respectively.In step 2, a fully satisfactory agreement was observed for 6 out of the 16 PCs and a quite satisfactory agreement was obtained for the remaining 10 PCs.

conclusionsOur findings highlight that in the whole HER2 evaluation process the two intermediate categories, scores 1+ and 2+, are less reproducible than scores 0 and 3+. These findings are relevant in clinical practice where the choice of treatment is based on HER2 positivity, suggesting the need to share evaluation procedures within laboratories and implement educational programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23965490
PMCPMC3766003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.