Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23965227›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Lessons learned from the conduct of a multisite cluster randomized practical trial of decision aids in rural and suburban primary care practices.

Kari L Ruud, Annie Leblanc, Rebecca J Mullan, Laurie J Pencille, Kristina Tiedje, Megan E Branda, Holly K Van Houten, Sara R Heim, Margary Kurland, Nilay D Shah and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01029288. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01029288 nacompleted

Impact of Decision Aids to Enhance Shared Decision Making for Diabetes

Ran2010Enrolled110Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetesArmsDiabetes Medication Choice Decision Aid, Statin Choice Decision Aid, Usual care for antihyperglycemic medication, Usual care for lipid therapy medication
PMID 23927490other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Clinic Personnel, Facilitator, and Parent Perspectives of eHealth Familias Unidas in Primary Care.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kari L RuudKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Annie Leblanc
Rebecca J Mullan
Laurie J Pencille
Kristina Tiedje
Megan E Branda
Holly K Van Houten
Sara R Heim
Margary Kurland
Nilay D Shah
Barbara P Yawn
Victor M Montori

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe decision aids for diabetes (DAD) trial explored the feasibility of testing the effectiveness of decision aids (DAs) about coronary prevention and diabetes medications in community-based primary care practices, including rural clinics that care for patients with type 2 diabetes.

methodsAs originally designed, we invited clinicians in eight practices to participate in the trial, reviewed the patient panel of clinicians who accepted our invitation for potentially eligible patients, and contacted these patients by phone, enrolling those who accepted our invitation. As enrollment failed to meet targets, we recruited four new practices. After discussing the study with the clinicians and receiving their support, we reviewed all clinic panels for potentially eligible patients. Clinicians were approached to confirm participation and patient eligibility, and patients were approached before their visit to provide written informed consent. This in-clinic approach required study coordinators to travel and stay longer at the clinics as well as to screen more patient records for eligibility. The in-clinic approach was associated with better recruitment rates, lower patient retention and outcome completion rates, and a better intervention effect.

resultsWe drew four lessons: 1) difficulties identifying potentially eligible patients threaten the viability of practical trials of DAs; 2) to improve the recruitment yield, recruit clinicians and patients for the study at the clinic, just before their visit; 3) approaches that improve recruitment may be associated with reduced retention and survey response; and 4) procedures that involve working closely with the practice may improve recruitment and may also affect the quality of the implementation of the interventions.

conclusionSuccess in practice-based trials in usual primary care including rural clinics may require the smallest possible research footprint on the practice while implementing a streamlined protocol favoring in-clinic, in-person interactions with clinicians and patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01029288.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesSuburban Health ServicesCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feasibility StudiesHumansMinnesotaPatient SelectionReproducibility of ResultsSample SizeTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23965227
PMCPMC3765278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.