Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23963781›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2013

Protein domain definition should allow for conditional disorder.

Kavestri Yegambaram, Esther M M Bulloch, Richard L Kingston

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Crystal structures of MBP fusion proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavestri YegambaramSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Esther M M Bulloch
Richard L Kingston
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are often classified in a binary fashion as either structured or disordered. However this approach has several deficits. Firstly, protein folding is always conditional on the physiochemical environment. A protein which is structured in some circumstances will be disordered in others. Secondly, it hides a fundamental asymmetry in behavior. While all structured proteins can be unfolded through a change in environment, not all disordered proteins have the capacity for folding. Failure to accommodate these complexities confuses the definition of both protein structural domains and intrinsically disordered regions. We illustrate these points with an experimental study of a family of small binding domains, drawn from the RNA polymerase of mumps virus and its closest relatives. Assessed at face value the domains fall on a structural continuum, with folded, partially folded, and near unstructured members. Yet the disorder present in the family is conditional, and these closely related polypeptides can access the same folded state under appropriate conditions. Any heuristic definition of the protein domain emphasizing conformational stability divides this domain family in two, in a way that makes no biological sense. Structural domains would be better defined by their ability to adopt a specific tertiary structure: a structure that may or may not be realized, dependent on the circumstances. This explicitly allows for the conditional nature of protein folding, and more clearly demarcates structural domains from intrinsically disordered regions that may function without folding.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, TertiaryAmino Acid SequenceCrystallography, X-RayEvolution, MolecularIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMumps virusPhylogenyProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein StabilityRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRubulavirusViral ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseViral Proteinscoupled binding and foldingintrinsic protein disordermumps virusprotein stabilityRNA-dependent RNA polymeraserubulavirusesstabilizing osmolytestrimethylamine N-oxide

Identifiers

PMID23963781
PMCPMC3831666
OpenAlexW1847534653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.