Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23963509›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2013

Differential proteomic analysis of acute contusive spinal cord injury in rats using iTRAQ reagent labeling and LC-MS/MS.

Anshu Chen, Shixin Sun, Rangaswamyrao Ravikumar, Nishant P Visavadiya, Joe E Springer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Application of Proteomics to Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anshu ChenDepartments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Anatomy and Neurobiology, and the Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
Shixin Sun
Rangaswamyrao Ravikumar
Nishant P Visavadiya
Joe E Springer
University of Kentucky · USCardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this experimental study, differential labeling with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reagents followed by liquid chromatography (LC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) proteomic approach was used to investigate differences in the proteome of rat spinal cord at 24 h following a moderate contusion injury. Spinal cord protein samples from the injury epicenter (or from sham controls) were trypsinized and differentially labeled with iTRAQ isotopic reagents. The differentially labeled samples were then combined into one sample mixture, separated by LC, and analyzed using MS/MS. Proteins were quantified by comparing the peak areas of iTRAQ reporter fragment ions in MS/MS spectra. The outcome of this analysis revealed that proteins involved in ubiquitination, endocytosis and exocytosis, energy metabolism, inflammatory response, oxidative stress, cytoskeletal disruption, and vascular damage were significantly altered at 24 h following spinal cord injury (SCI). This study demonstrates the utility of the iTRAQ method in proteomic studies and provides further insights into secondary events that occur during acute times following SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, LiquidEndocytosisEnergy MetabolismExocytosisFemaleNerve Tissue ProteinsProteomicsRatsSpinal Cord InjuriesTandem Mass SpectrometryUbiquitinationNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23963509
OpenAlexW2063566917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.