Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23963299›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014

Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals further genetic heterogeneity in axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy and a mutation in HSPB1.

Emil Ylikallio, Mridul Johari, Svetlana Konovalova, Jukka S Moilanen, Sari Kiuru-Enari, Mari Auranen, Leila Pajunen, Henna Tyynismaa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chaperonopathies: Spotlight on Hereditary Motor Neuropathies.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emil YlikallioResearch Programs Unit, Molecular Neurology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mridul JohariResearch Programs Unit, Molecular Neurology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Svetlana KonovalovaResearch Programs Unit, Molecular Neurology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka S MoilanenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Sari Kiuru-EnariDepartment of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Mari Auranen1] Research Programs Unit, Molecular Neurology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland [2] Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Leila PajunenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Henna Tyynismaa1] Research Programs Unit, Molecular Neurology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland [2] Department of Medical Genetics, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a group of hereditary peripheral neuropathies. The dominantly inherited axonal CMT2 displays striking genetic heterogeneity, with 17 presently known disease genes. The large number of candidate genes, combined with lack of genotype-phenotype correlations, has made genetic diagnosis in CMT2 time-consuming and costly. In Finland, 25% of dominant CMT2 is explained by either a GDAP1 founder mutation or private MFN2 mutations but the rest of the families have remained without molecular diagnosis. Whole-exome and genome sequencing are powerful techniques to find disease mutations for CMT patients but they require large amounts of sequencing to confidently exclude heterozygous variants in all candidate genes, and they generate a vast amount of irrelevant data for diagnostic needs. Here we tested a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to screen the CMT2 genes. In total, 15 unrelated patients from dominant CMT2 families from Finland, in whom MFN2 and GDAP1 mutations had been excluded, participated in the study. The targeted approach produced sufficient sequence coverage for 95% of the 309 targeted exons, the rest we excluded by Sanger sequencing. Unexpectedly, the screen revealed a disease mutation only in one family, in the HSPB1 gene. Thus, new disease genes underlie CMT2 in the remaining families, indicating further genetic heterogeneity. We conclude that targeted next-generation sequencing is an efficient tool for genetic screening in CMT2 that also aids in the selection of patients for genome-wide approaches.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdolescentAdultAxonsCell Cycle ProteinsCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseExonsFemaleFinlandGenetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSPB1 protein, humanMAD2L1BP protein, humanMolecular ChaperonesNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23963299
PMCPMC3953916
OpenAlexW2001018214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.