Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23963260›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2013

Brucellosis in low-income and middle-income countries.

Matthew P Rubach, Jo E B Halliday, Sarah Cleaveland, John A Crump

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew P RubachDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jo E B Halliday
Sarah Cleaveland
John A Crump
University of Glasgow · GBDuke University Health System · USUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

University of California Global Health Institute Program for Fellows and ScholarsR25TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COHEN, CRAIG R, STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2012 to 2017
$6.4M
Vanderbilt-Emory-Cornell-Duke Consortium for Global Health Fellows (VECDor)R25TW009337 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT, VERMUND, STEN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
International Clinical Trials UnitU01AI062563 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN A · 2004 to 2007
$4.0M
The Impact and Society Ecology of Bacterial Zoonoses in Northern Tanzania: UnderR01TW009237 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009302/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H00935/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J010367/1FIC NIH HHS R01 TW009237FIC NIH HHS R01TW009237FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009337FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009343FIC NIH HHS R25TW009343NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI062563Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096400/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHuman brucellosis is a neglected, underrecognized infection of widespread geographic distribution. It causes acute febrile illness and a potentially debilitating chronic infection in humans, and livestock infection has substantial socioeconomic impact. This review describes new information regarding the epidemiology of brucellosis in the developing world and advances in diagnosis and treatment. RECENT

findingsThe highest recorded incidence of human brucellosis occurs in the Middle East and Central Asia. Fever etiology studies demonstrate brucellosis as a cause of undifferentiated febrile illness in the developing world. Brucellosis is a rare cause of fever among returning travelers, but is more common among travelers returning from the Middle East and North Africa. Sensitive and specific rapid diagnostic tests appropriate for resource-limited settings have been validated. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that optimal treatment for human brucellosis consists of doxycycline and an aminoglycoside. Decreasing the burden of human brucellosis requires control of animal brucellosis, but evidence to inform the design of control programs in the developing world is needed. SUMMARY: Brucellosis causes substantial morbidity in human and animal populations. While improvements in diagnostic options for resource-limited settings and stronger evidence for optimal therapy should enhance identification and treatment of human brucellosis, prevention of human disease through control in animals remains paramount.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsiaBrucellosisHumansLivestockMiddle EastNeglected DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23963260
PMCPMC3888775
OpenAlexW2032013011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.