ReviewCirculation. Cardiovascular genetics2013
To replicate or not to replicate: the case of pharmacogenetic studies: Establishing validity of pharmacogenomic findings: from replication to triangulation.
Review in Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes and Antihypertensive Treatment: A Genome-Wide Interaction Meta-Analysis in the International Consortium for Antihypertensive Pharmacogenomics Studies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Pooled it
- Large-scale pharmacogenomic study of sulfonylureas and the QT, JT and QRS intervals: CHARGE Pharmacogenomics Working Group.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Pooled it
- The Beta-Blocker Pharmacogenetic Puzzle: More Pieces of Evidence for Pharmacodynamic Candidate Variants.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Whole genome sequence analysis of apparent treatment resistant hypertension status in participants from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenomics, How to Deal with Different Types of Variants in Next Generation Sequencing Data in the Personalized Medicine Area.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- The Association of Aquaporin-1 Gene with Marathon Running Performance Level: a Confirmatory Study Conducted in Male Hispanic Marathon Runners.Sports medicine - open · 2020Article
- DNA methylome profiling of all-cause mortality in comparison with age-associated methylation patterns.Clinical epigenetics · 2019Article
- Complex polymorphisms in endocytosis genes suggest alpha-cyclodextrin as a treatment for breast cancer.PloS one · 2018Article
- Single-Subject Studies in Translational Nutrition Research.Annual review of nutrition · 2017Review
- Genome-wide Association Study of Susceptibility to Particulate Matter-Associated QT Prolongation.Environmental health perspectives · 2017Article
- A Neighborhood-Wide Association Study (NWAS): Example of prostate cancer aggressiveness.PloS one · 2017Article
- The Application of Genomics in Diabetes: Barriers to Discovery and Implementation.Diabetes care · 2016Article
- Pharmacogenetics in Cardiovascular Medicine.Current genetic medicine reports · 2016Article
- RP1-13D10.2 Is a Novel Modulator of Statin-Induced Changes in Cholesterol.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2016Article
- Pharmacogenomics of hypertension and heart disease.Current hypertension reports · 2015Review
- Genotype-based clinical trials in cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2015Review
- Pharmacogenomics in heart failure: where are we now and how can we reach clinical application?Cardiology in reviewReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.