ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013
Rationale and design of a UK database for a rare cancer type: the GEM Registry for gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Article
- Big Data: the challenge for small research groups in the era of cancer genomics.British journal of cancer · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite advances in the management of and changes in clinical practice, little is known about the epidemiology, patterns of care and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients in the UK. Patient registries are receiving increasing attention as they can provide important information on clinical practice and patient outcomes. The rationale and study design of the GIST Epidemiology and Management (GEM) Registry, which forms part of the routine clinical practice for GISTs in several UK centres, are described.
methodsThe GEM Registry is a secure web-based registry system designed around a Microsoft Access core using SQL interface. Demographic, surgical, histopathological and clinical data will be captured including treatment outcomes and survival. The registry was piloted in six centres and following further fine tuning of the data sets, ethical committee submission and approval was completed.
resultsThe GEM National Registry is the first of its kind to be implemented in rare cancers in UK. The registry is being rolled out initially in selected centres with the aim to expand to other centres. The first publication reporting analyses of the central data set is anticipated for the summer of 2013.
conclusionGEM Registry will enable us to obtain a clear picture of incidence/prevalence of GISTS in UK. Clinicians will be able to review the prognostic and predictive value of variables in a large prospective data set. The data can be used for planning the delivery and improving the quality of care. This information is likely to inform clinical practice and, in years to come, guide the development and implementation of clinical trials for novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The results will not only benefit the GIST community, but also serve as a basis for the study of other rare tumour types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.