Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23962839›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in developmental biology2013

Temporal patterning of neural progenitors in Drosophila.

Xin Li, Zhenqing Chen, Claude Desplan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in developmental biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Time and space in segmentation.Interface focus · 2021
    Article
  15. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Foxn4 is a temporal identity factor conferring mid/late-early retinal competence and involved in retinal synaptogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Neurogenesis and Specification of Retinal Ganglion Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin LiDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
Zhenqing Chen
Claude Desplan
New York University · US

Funding

Neurogenesis of the optic lobesR01EY017916 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Claude Desplan · 2007 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila has recently become a powerful model system to understand the mechanisms of temporal patterning of neural progenitors called neuroblasts (NBs). Two different temporal sequences of transcription factors (TFs) have been found to be sequentially expressed in NBs of two different systems: the Hunchback, Krüppel, Pdm1/Pdm2, Castor, and Grainyhead sequence in the Drosophila ventral nerve cord; and the Homothorax, Klumpfuss, Eyeless, Sloppy-paired, Dichaete, and Tailless sequence that patterns medulla NBs. In addition, the intermediate neural progenitors of type II NB lineages are patterned by a different sequence: Dichaete, Grainyhead, and Eyeless. These three examples suggest that temporal patterning of neural precursors by sequences of TFs is a common theme to generate neural diversity. Cross-regulations, including negative feedback regulation and positive feedforward regulation among the temporal factors, can facilitate the progression of the sequence. However, there are many remaining questions to understand the mechanism of temporal transitions. The temporal sequence progression is intimately linked to the progressive restriction of NB competence, and eventually determines the end of neurogenesis. Temporal identity has to be integrated with spatial identity information, as well as with the Notch-dependent binary fate choices, in order to generate specific neuron fates.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsDrosophilaEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisTime FactorsTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsDrosophilaNeuroblastsTemporal sequenceTemporal specificationTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID23962839
PMCPMC3927947
OpenAlexW121396268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.