ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2014
A conceptual framework for improving well-being in people with a diagnosis of psychosis.
Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of influences on implementation of peer support work for adults with mental health problems.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluation of a positive psychotherapy group intervention for people with psychosis: pilot randomised controlled trial.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Lived Experience of Health and Wellbeing Among Young People with Early Psychosis in Aotearoa New Zealand.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- A good life with psychosis: rate of positive outcomes in first-episode psychosis at 10-year follow-up.Psychological medicine · 2024Article
- Psychosocial interventions promoting personal recovery in people with schizophrenia: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Improvements in Hope, Engagement and Functioning Following a Recovery-Focused Sub-Acute Inpatient Intervention: a Six-Month Evaluation.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2021Article
- Personal Recovery and Its Determinants Among People Living With Schizophrenia in China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Article
- Using Peer Support in Developing Empowering Mental Health Services (UPSIDES): Background, Rationale and Methodology.Annals of global health · 2019Article
- Flourishing With Psychosis: A Prospective Examination on the Interactions Between Clinical, Functional, and Personal Recovery Processes on Well-being Among Individuals with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Article
- Developing a change model for peer worker interventions in mental health services: a qualitative research study.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2015Article
- New trends in assessing the outcomes of mental health interventions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. Well-being is important for people with severe mental illness, such as psychosis. So far, no clear concept of well-being exists for this client group. A recent systematic review and narrative synthesis developed a static framework of well-being components. The present study aims to validate the static framework and to illuminate the processes by which well-being is experienced by people with psychosis. Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 service users with psychosis exploring their experience of well-being. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data employing techniques taken from grounded theory to enhance the rigour of the analysis. Respondent validation was undertaken with 13 of the 23 participants. Results. Three superordinate categories of well-being were identified: current sense of self; transition to enhanced sense of self and enhanced sense of self. In the dynamic process of improving well-being the current sense of self undergoes a transition to an enhanced sense of self. The four factors influencing the transition are consistent with the static framework of well-being, hence validating the static framework. In addition, we identified three determinants of current sense of self and seven indicators of enhanced sense of self, which represent the achievement of improved well-being. Conclusions. This study provides an empirically defensible framework for understanding well-being in terms of determinants, influences and indicators. The influences are targets for interventions to improve well-being, and the indicators are outcome domains to assess the effectiveness of services in supporting well-being.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.