Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23962670›Full record

ReviewBehavioural processes2014

Interactions of timing and prediction error learning.

Kimberly Kirkpatrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioural processes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Dopamine and the interdependency of time perception and reward.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Time-scale-invariant information-theoretic contingencies in discrimination learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2019
    Article
  6. The effects of stimulus distribution form during trace conditioning.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Learning about the CS during latent inhibition: Preexposure enhances temporal control.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2016
    Article
  13. Reward Contrast Effects on Impulsive Choice and Timing in Rats.Timing & time perception (Leiden, Netherlands) · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time.International journal of comparative psychology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kimberly KirkpatrickKansas State University, United States. Electronic address: kirkpatr@ksu.edu.

Funding

Timing, Reward Processing and choiceR01MH085739 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, TRAVIS R · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E008224/1NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH085739NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timing and prediction error learning have historically been treated as independent processes, but growing evidence has indicated that they are not orthogonal. Timing emerges at the earliest time point when conditioned responses are observed, and temporal variables modulate prediction error learning in both simple conditioning and cue competition paradigms. In addition, prediction errors, through changes in reward magnitude or value alter timing of behavior. Thus, there appears to be a bi-directional interaction between timing and prediction error learning. Modern theories have attempted to integrate the two processes with mixed success. A neurocomputational approach to theory development is espoused, which draws on neurobiological evidence to guide and constrain computational model development. Heuristics for future model development are presented with the goal of sparking new approaches to theory development in the timing and prediction error fields.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalMotivationAnimalsBrainConditioning, ClassicalHumansLearningNeural PathwaysRewardComputational modelingMotivationPrediction error learningTiming

Identifiers

PMID23962670
PMCPMC3926915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.