Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23962623›Full record

ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2014

PEGylated drugs in rheumatology--why develop them and do they work?

Thomas McDonnell, Yiannis Ioannou, Anisur Rahman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Pharmacogenomics of TNF inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Site-specific albumination of a therapeutic protein with multi-subunit to prolong activity in vivo.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas McDonnellCentre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, University College London, Room 412 Rayne Institute, 5 University Street, London WC1E 6JF, UK. anisur.rahman@ucl.ac.uk.
Yiannis Ioannou
Anisur Rahman
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001629Versus Arthritis 19423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of efficacy and drug-related adverse effects are important reasons for the discontinuation of treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases. The development of new biologic therapies seeks to address these problems by specifically targeting the pathogenic mechanisms of disease. Most current biologics are proteins (particularly antibodies and enzymes) administered parenterally. It is important to optimize properties such as serum half-life, immunogenicity and solubility. Companies have thus begun to modify the drugs by conjugate chemistry, binding inert molecules such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) to biologic molecules to improve their pharmacodynamic properties. The use of PEG to alter these properties has to be weighed against the negative aspects of PEGylation, such as decreased activity and heterogeneity. This review focuses on the currently available PEGylated drugs used in rheumatological diseases, their efficacy, drawbacks and the current clinical trial evidence supporting their use.

Indexed as

Polyethylene GlycolsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsHalf-LifeHumansImmunogeneticsRheumatic DiseasesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsPolyethylene Glycolsclinical trialsgoutPEGylationrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID23962623
PMCPMC3930883
OpenAlexW2162332961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.