Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23962509›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2013

Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.

Neetu Chawla, Eboneé N Butler, Jennifer Lund, Joan L Warren, Linda C Harlan, K Robin Yabroff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04159363 (The Effectiveness of an Interactive Colorectal Cancer Self-Management Enhancement Smartphone-based Psychosocial Intervention Programme), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04159363 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of an Interactive Colorectal Cancer Self-Management Enhancement Smartphone-based Psychosocial Intervention Programme (iCanManage) on Outcomes of Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Family Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore Cancer SocietyRan2020 to 2021Enrolled200ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsAn interactive Colorectal Cancer self-Management enhancement smartphone-based psychosocial intervention programme (iCanManage)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Comparing cancer care, outcomes, and costs across health systems: charting the course.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013
    Article
  17. Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neetu ChawlaHealth Services and Economics Branch/Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Room 3E346, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Eboneé N Butler
Jennifer Lund
Joan L Warren
Linda C Harlan
K Robin Yabroff
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Research ProjectU54CA153499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG, CHOW, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2015
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in women and the third most common in men worldwide. In this study, we used MEDLINE to conduct a systematic review of existing literature published in English between 2000 and 2010 on patterns of colorectal cancer care. Specifically, this review examined 66 studies conducted in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand to assess patterns of initial care, post-diagnostic surveillance, and end-of-life care for colorectal cancer. The majority of studies in this review reported rates of initial care, and limited research examined either post-diagnostic surveillance or end-of-life care for colorectal cancer. Older colorectal cancer patients and individuals with comorbidities generally received less surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Patients with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to receive treatment, and variations in patterns of care were observed by patient demographic and clinical characteristics, geographical location, and hospital setting. However, there was wide variability in data collection and measures, health-care systems, patient populations, and population representativeness, making direct comparisons challenging. Future research and policy efforts should emphasize increased comparability of data systems, promote data standardization, and encourage collaboration between and within European cancer registries and administrative databases.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareRegistriesAdultAgedAustraliaColorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandSocioeconomic FactorsTerminal CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23962509
PMCPMC3888187
OpenAlexW2079160940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.