Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23962031›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2014

Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Terje Sundstrøm, Helge Asbjørnsen, Samer Habiba, Geir Arne Sunde, Knut Wester

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evidence for the use of spinal collars in stabilising spinal injuries in the pre-hospital setting in trauma patients: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effectiveness and safety of techniques for cervical spine immobilization in mountain rescue.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Terje Sundstrøm1 Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway .
Helge Asbjørnsen
Samer Habiba
Geir Arne Sunde
Knut Wester
Haukeland University Hospital · NOStiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cervical collar has been routinely used for trauma patients for more than 30 years and is a hallmark of state-of-the-art prehospital trauma care. However, the existing evidence for this practice is limited: Randomized, controlled trials are largely missing, and there are uncertain effects on mortality, neurological injury, and spinal stability. Even more concerning, there is a growing body of evidence and opinion against the use of collars. It has been argued that collars cause more harm than good, and that we should simply stop using them. In this critical review, we discuss the pros and cons of collar use in trauma patients and reflect on how we can move our clinical practice forward. Conclusively, we propose a safe, effective strategy for prehospital spinal immobilization that does not include routine use of collars.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeHumansImmobilizationSpinal Injuries

Identifiers

PMID23962031
PMCPMC3949434
OpenAlexW2166922545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.