Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23962019›Full record

ReviewFoodborne pathogens and disease2013

Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends.

Melha Mellata

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 221 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 441 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Silent Reservoirs: Antibiotic-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic profiling of ESBL/AmpC-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melha MellataThe Biodesign Institute, Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

A novel Salmonella vaccine to protect against extra intestinal pathogenic E. coliR21AI090416 · NIAID · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MELLATA, MELHA · 2010 to 2011
$417k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R21AI090416-01NIH/NIAID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) constitutes ongoing health concerns for women, newborns, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals due to increased numbers of urinary tract infections (UTIs), newborn meningitis, abdominal sepsis, and septicemia. E. coli remains the leading cause of UTIs, with recent investigations reporting the emergence of E. coli as the predominant cause of nosocomial and neonatal sepsis infections. This shift from the traditional Gram-positive bacterial causes of nosocomial and neonatal sepsis infections could be attributed to the use of intrapartum chemoprophylaxis against Gram-positive bacteria and the appearance of antibiotic (ATB) resistance in E. coli. While ExPEC strains cause significant healthcare concerns, these bacteria also infect chickens and cause the poultry industry economic losses due to costs of containment, mortality, and disposal of carcasses. To circumvent ExPEC-related costs, ATBs are commonly used in the poultry industry to prevent/treat microbial infections and promote growth and performance. In an unfortunate linkage, chicken products are suspected to be a source of foodborne ExPEC infections and ATB resistance in humans. Therefore, the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) (resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents) among avian E. coli has created major economic and health concerns, affecting both human healthcare and poultry industries. Increased numbers of immunocompromised individuals, including the elderly, coupled with MDR among ExPEC strains, will continue to challenge the treatment of ExPEC infections and likely lead to increased treatment costs. With ongoing complications due to emerging ATB resistance, novel treatment strategies are necessary to control ExPEC infections. Recognizing and treating the zoonotic risk posed by ExPEC would greatly enhance food safety and positively impact human health.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnimalsCellulitisChickensCross InfectionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHumansMeningitis, Escherichia coliRespiratory Tract InfectionsSalpingitisSepsisUrinary Tract InfectionsVirulence FactorsZoonosesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID23962019
PMCPMC3865812
OpenAlexW2009717913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.