Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23961835›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2013

Australian general practitioner perceptions of the detection and screening of at-risk drinking, and the role of the AUDIT-C: a qualitative study.

Chun Wah Michael Tam, Nicholas Zwar, Roslyn Markham

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05580549 (Prevalence of Hazardous Alcohol Use in a Population With Hypertension in Primary Care Detected With PEth and AUDIT - Observational Cross-sectional Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05580549 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prevalence of Hazardous Alcohol Use in a Population With Hypertension in Primary Care Detected With PEth and AUDIT - Observational Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion StockholmRan2022 to 2023Enrolled270ConditionsHypertension, Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use, UnspecifiedArmsAlcohol biomarker Phosphatidylethanol (PEth)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacy-based alcohol-misuse services: current perspectives.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chun Wah Michael TamSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Level 3 Samuels Building, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. m.tam@unsw.edu.au.
Nicholas Zwar
Roslyn Markham

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt-risk drinking is common in Australia. Validated screening tools such as the AUDIT-C have been promoted to general practitioners (GPs), but appear rarely used and detection of at-risk drinking in primary care remains low. We sought to describe Australian GP perceptions of the detection and screening of at-risk drinking; to understand their low uptake of alcohol screening questionnaires, and in particular, their attitude to the adoption of the AUDIT-C.

methodsSemi-structured focus group interviews of four groups of GPs and GP trainees were conducted in metropolitan Sydney between August and October 2011. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using grounded theory methodology.

resultsWe identified four main themes: there was consensus that detecting at-risk drinking is important but difficult to do, social and cultural attitudes to alcohol consumption affect willingness to ask questions about its use, the dynamics of patient-doctor interactions are important, and alcohol screening questionnaires lack practical utility. Analysis suggests that the conceptual barriers to detecting at-risk drinking were: community stigma and stereotypes of "problem drinking", GP perceptions of unreliable patient alcohol use histories, and the perceived threat to the patient-doctor relationship.

conclusionThis small exploratory study found that the practice of, and barriers to, detecting at-risk drinking appear to be inextricably linked to the sociocultural beliefs surrounding alcohol use. Screening questionnaires such as the AUDIT-C are not designed to address these issues. In the current context, it is unlikely that approaches that focus on the use of these tools will be effective at improving detection of at-risk drinking by GPs.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAttitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersSubstance Abuse DetectionAdultAgedAlcoholismAustraliaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID23961835
PMCPMC3765703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.