ArticleSpringerPlus2013
Barriers and facilitators to self-care in chronic heart failure: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "That kind of changes things": a meta-synthesis of the lived experiences of people with chronic heart disease.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- Working towards a new normal: a meta-synthesis of patient-reported aspects of a good life with heart disease.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview.Health research policy and systems · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Recovery from Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Perspectives of Consumers, Clinicians, Family and Carers.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Current status and global trends in self-care among patients with heart failure: challenges and opportunities.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2026Article
- Facilitators and barriers to home eating behaviors in patients with heart failure: A qualitative descriptive study comparing patient and healthcare expert perspectives.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- A randomized controlled trial comparing visual-based and traditional educational materials in radiotherapy patient education: implications for nursing practice.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Construction of a home-based social support service content framework for Chinese patients with chronic heart failure based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Investigating the correlation of self-care and quality-of-life patients with heart failure.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Patient experience of treatment burden in chronic heart failure self-care interventions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Update of the Situation-specific Theory for health management in heart failure: Delphi study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Heart Failure Care Facilitators and Barriers in Rural Haiti: A Qualitative Study.Annals of global health · 2024Article
- Exploring physical activity preferences and motivation in long-term cardiac prevention: An Austrian cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- The changing role of patients, and nursing and medical professionals as a result of digitalization of health and heart failure care.Journal of nursing management · 2022Article
- Reasons for non-participation in a self-care training program for diabetic patients: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews.The patient · 2021Article
- Barriers to Self-care Among Patients with Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study.Journal of caring sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a costly condition that places large demands on self-care. Failure to adhere with self-care recommendations is common and associated with frequent hospitalization. Understanding the factors that enable or inhibit self-care is essential in developing effective health care interventions. This qualitative review was conducted to address the research question, "What are the barriers and facilitators to self-care among patients with CHF?" Electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Google scholar were searched. Articles were included if they were peer reviewed (1995 to 2012), in English language and investigated at least one contextual or individual factor impacting on self-care in CHF patients > 18years. The criteria defined by Kuper et al. including clarity and appropriateness of sampling, data collection and data analysis were used to appraise the quality of articles. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Factors impacting on self-care were included factors related to symptoms of CHF and the self-care process; factors related to personal characteristics; and factors related to environment and self-care system. Important factors such as socioeconomic situation and education level have not been explored extensively and there were minimal data on the influence of age, gender, self-confidence and duration of disease. Although there is an emerging literature, further research is required to address the barriers and facilitators to self-care in patients with CHF in order to provide an appropriate guide for intervention strategies to improve self-care in CHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.