Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23959914›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2013

Different risk-increasing drugs in recurrent versus single fallers: are recurrent fallers a distinct population?

Marjan Askari, Saied Eslami, Alice C Scheffer, Stephanie Medlock, Sophia E de Rooij, Nathalie van der Velde, Ameen Abu-Hanna

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using pharmacy dispensing data to predict falls in older individuals.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of the quality of fall detection and management in primary care in the Netherlands based on the ACOVE quality indicators.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marjan Askari
Saied Eslami
Alice C Scheffer
Stephanie Medlock
Sophia E de Rooij
Nathalie van der Velde
Ameen Abu-Hanna
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy, and specifically the use of multiple fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRID), have been associated with increased risk of falling in older age. However, it is not yet clear whether the known set of FRIDs can be extrapolated to recurrent fallers, since they form a distinct group of more vulnerable older persons with different characteristics.

objectivesWe aim to investigate which classes of medications are associated with recurrent falls in elderly patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) after a fall.

methodsThis study had a cross-sectional design and was conducted in the ED of an academic medical center. Patients who sustained a fall, 65 years or older, and who visited the ED between 2004 and 2010 were invited to fill in a validated fall questionnaire designed to assess patient and fall characteristics (CAREFALL Triage Instrument [CTI]). We translated self-reported medications to anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) codes (at the second level). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the association between medication classes and the outcome parameter (recurrent fall). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the associations after adjustment to potential confounders.

resultsIn total 2,258 patients participated in our study, of whom 39 % (873) had sustained two or more falls within the previous year. After adjustment for the potential confounders, drugs for acid-related disorders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29; 95 % CI 1.03–1.60), analgesics (aOR 1.22; 95 % CI 1.06–1.41), anti-Parkinson drugs (aOR 1.59; 95 % CI 1.02–2.46), nasal preparations (aOR 1.49; 95 % CI 1.07–2.08), ophthalmologicals (aOR 1.51; 95 % CI 1.10–2.09); antipsychotics (aOR 2.21; 95 % CI 1.08–4.52), and antidepressants (aOR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.13–2.37) remained statistically significantly associated with an ED visit due to a recurrent fall.

conclusionsKnown FRIDs, such as psychotropic drugs, also increase the risk of recurrent falls. However, we found four relatively new classes that showed significant association with recurrent falls. In part, these classes may act as markers of frailty and comorbidity, or they may reflect differences in the risk factors affecting the older, frailer population that tends to sustain recurrent falls. Further investigation is needed to elucidate causes and ways to prevent recurrent falls.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsAccidental FallsAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePolypharmacyRecurrenceRegression AnalysisRiskPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23959914
OpenAlexW1990427893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.