Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23959844›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images.

Sonal Kothari, John H Phan, Todd H Stokes, May D Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
30.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. NEUSEG: INTERPRETABLE UNSUPERVISED GM/WM SEGMENTATION IN BRAIN HISTOPATHOLOGY USING NUCLEI MORPHOMETRICS.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PySpatial: A High-Speed Whole Slide Image Pathomics Toolkit.IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. High-performance Data Management for Whole Slide Image Analysis in Digital Pathology.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Accelerated Pipeline for Multi-label Renal Pathology Image Segmentation at the Whole Slide Image Level.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonal KothariSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
John H Phan
Todd H Stokes
May D Wang
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHIN, DONG M · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
Contrast-Enhanced and Image-Guided Surgery of Lung CancerR01CA163256 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JO, HANJOONG, SINGHAL, SUNIL · 2011 to 2015
$6.5M
Nanotechnology for Multiplexed and Intraoperative Cancer DetectionRC2CA148265 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2009 to 2010
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1RC2CA148265NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163256NCI NIH HHS R01CA163256NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148265NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338NCI NIH HHS U54CA119338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWith the objective of bringing clinical decision support systems to reality, this article reviews histopathological whole-slide imaging informatics methods, associated challenges, and future research opportunities. TARGET AUDIENCE: This review targets pathologists and informaticians who have a limited understanding of the key aspects of whole-slide image (WSI) analysis and/or a limited knowledge of state-of-the-art technologies and analysis methods. SCOPE: First, we discuss the importance of imaging informatics in pathology and highlight the challenges posed by histopathological WSI. Next, we provide a thorough review of current methods for: quality control of histopathological images; feature extraction that captures image properties at the pixel, object, and semantic levels; predictive modeling that utilizes image features for diagnostic or prognostic applications; and data and information visualization that explores WSI for de novo discovery. In addition, we highlight future research directions and discuss the impact of large public repositories of histopathological data, such as the Cancer Genome Atlas, on the field of pathology informatics. Following the review, we present a case study to illustrate a clinical decision support system that begins with quality control and ends with predictive modeling for several cancer endpoints. Currently, state-of-the-art software tools only provide limited image processing capabilities instead of complete data analysis for clinical decision-making. We aim to inspire researchers to conduct more research in pathology imaging informatics so that clinical decision support can become a reality.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtifactsBiopsyHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPathologycancer predictioncomputer-aided diagnosisdecision support systemspathology imaging informaticswhole-slide images

Identifiers

PMID23959844
PMCPMC3822114
OpenAlexW2105739910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.