Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23959322›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Impact of in vivo triazole and echinocandin combination therapy for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: enhanced efficacy against Cyp51 mutant isolates.

Alexander J Lepak, Karen Marchillo, Jamie VanHecker, David R Andes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Evaluation of anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. APX001 Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Determination againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  10. Animal Models of Aspergillosis.Comparative medicine · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Voriconazole-refractory invasive aspergillosis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2017
    Review
  13. Rodent Models of Invasive Aspergillosis due toFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  14. Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: Can We Retain the Clinical Use of Mold-Active Antifungal Azoles?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Review
  15. High-Level Pan-Azole-Resistant Aspergillosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander J LepakUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Karen Marchillo
Jamie VanHecker
David R Andes
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies examining combination therapy for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) have revealed conflicting results, including antagonism, indifference, and enhanced effects. The most commonly employed combination for this infection includes a mold-active triazole and echinocandin. Few studies have evaluated combination therapy from a pharmacodynamic (PD) perspective, and even fewer have examined combination therapy against both wild-type and azole-resistant Cyp51 mutant isolates. The current studies aim to fill this gap in knowledge. Four Aspergillus fumigatus isolates were utilized, including a wild-type strain, an Fks1 mutant (posaconazole susceptible and caspofungin resistant), and two Cyp51 mutants (posaconazole resistant). A neutropenic murine model of IPA was used for the treatment studies. The dosing design included monotherapy with posaconazole, monotherapy with caspofungin, and combination therapy with both. Efficacy was determined using quantitative PCR, and results were normalized to known quantities of conidia (conidial equivalents [CE]). The static dose, 1-log kill dose, and associated PD target area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio were determined for monotherapy and combination therapy. Monotherapy experiments revealed potent activity for posaconazole, with reductions of 3 to 4 log10 Aspergillus CE/ml with the two "low"-MIC isolates. Posaconazole alone was less effective for the two isolates with higher MICs. Caspofungin monotherapy did not produce a significant decrease in fungal burden for any strain. Combination therapy with the two antifungals did not enhance efficacy for the two posaconazole-susceptible isolates. However, the drug combination produced synergistic activity against both posaconazole-resistant isolates. Specifically, the combination resulted in a 1- to 2-log10 decline in burden that would not have been predicted based on the monotherapy results for each drug. This corresponded to a reduction in the free-drug posaconazole AUC/MIC ratio needed for stasis of up to 17-fold. The data suggest that combination therapy using a triazole and an echinocandin may be a beneficial treatment strategy for triazole-resistant isolates.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveAspergillus fumigatusCaspofunginDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, FungalDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationEchinocandinsFemaleHumansInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisLipopeptidesMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID23959322
PMCPMC3811282
OpenAlexW1965072000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.