ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2013
[Current status and problems of the entirely subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD®)].
Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Updated ESC guideline: innovations for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and recommendations for prevention of sudden cardiac death].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2016Review
- [Completely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Care of S-ICD wearers during childbirth].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevention of sudden cardiac death is one of the most important tasks of cardiology. Transvenous ICD-systems have impressively proven their effectiveness in numerous randomized trials. Transvenous systems have their limitations due to frequent long-term lead complications. Having been available for a few years, the entirely subcutaneous ICD-system (S-ICD®, Boston Scientific, USA, former Cameron Health, USA) seems to be a promising alternative despite the lack of prospective data. The implantation of the SICD® can be performed easily; lead complications are rare because of the totally subcutaneous implantation. The detection and therapy of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias seems to be safe, although inappropriate therapies are a common problem in cases of insufficient ECG screening. S-ICD® is no alternative to the transvenous system due to limited programming options and the lack of stimulation, but it is an interesting supplement of ICD therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23959040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.