Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23958945›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2014

Treatment of first-episode non-affective psychosis: a randomized comparison of aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone over 1 year.

Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Victor Ortiz-Garcia de la Foz, Ignacio Mata, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola, Paula Suarez-Pinilla, Elsa M Valdizan, Obdulia Martinez-Garcia, Rocío Pérez-Iglesias

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benedicto Crespo-Facorro
Victor Ortiz-Garcia de la Foz
Ignacio Mata
Rosa Ayesa-Arriola
Paula Suarez-Pinilla
Elsa M Valdizan
Obdulia Martinez-Garcia
Rocío Pérez-Iglesias
Universidad de Cantabria · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDiscontinuation of antipsychotic treatment at early phases increases the risk of poor adherence to maintenance drug therapy. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of effectiveness may determine a good adherence to treatment.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of aripiprazole, ziprasidone and quetiapine in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders at 1 year.

methodFrom October 2005 to January 2011 a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred two first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (N = 78), ziprasidone (N = 62), or quetiapine (N = 62) and followed up for 1 year. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy.

resultsThe overall dropout rate at 1 year was 13.37 %. The treatment discontinuation rate differed significantly between treatment groups (aripiprazole = 43.6 %, ziprasidone = 66.1 % and quetiapine = 82.3 %) (χ 2 = 22.545; p < 0.001). Insufficient efficacy in the group of quetiapine is the most important reason for differences in discontinuation rates between agents (χ 2 = 19.436; p < 0.001). The mean time to all-cause discontinuation was significantly different between groups (LogRank = 30.732 p < 0.001). The profile of extrapyramidal symptoms varies between treatments. Patients on ziprasidone were more likely to be prescribed antidepressants.

conclusionsFirst episode patients treated with quetiapine have a higher risk of treatment discontinuation at midterm due to insufficient efficacy. Establishing differences between SGAs may help clinicians on prescribing decision for treatment of individuals presenting with first-episode non-affective psychosis.

Indexed as

AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleDibenzothiazepinesFemaleHumansMalePatient DropoutsPiperazinesPsychotic DisordersQuetiapine FumarateQuinolonesThiazolesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleDibenzothiazepinesPiperazinesQuetiapine FumarateQuinolonesThiazolesziprasidone

Identifiers

PMID23958945
OpenAlexW1974171027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.