ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2013
RNAlater facilitates microdissection of sensory cell-enriched samples from the mouse cochlea for transcriptional analyses.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized approaches to profile low biomass DNA and RNA virome in the upper respiratory tract of beef cattle.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Toll-like receptor 4 modulates the cochlear immune response to acoustic injury.Cell death & disease · 2016Article
- Variation analysis of transcriptome changes reveals cochlear genes and their associated functions in cochlear susceptibility to acoustic overstimulation.Hearing research · 2015Article
- Activation of the antigen presentation function of mononuclear phagocyte populations associated with the basilar membrane of the cochlea after acoustic overstimulation.Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Molecular profile of cochlear immunity in the resident cells of the organ of Corti.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular analyses of cochlear pathology rely on the acquisition of high-quality cochlear samples. For small rodents, isolating sensory cell-enriched samples with well-preserved RNA integrity for transcriptional analyses poses a significant challenge. Here, we report a microdissection technique for isolating sensory cell-enriched samples from the cochlea. We found that treating the tissue with RNAlater, a RNA preservation medium, alters the physical properties of the tissue and facilitates the dissection. Unlike previous samples that have been isolated from the sensory epithelium, our samples contain defined cell populations that have a consistent ratio of sensory cells to supporting cells. Importantly, the RNA components were well preserved. With this microdissection method, we collected three types of samples: sensory cell-enriched, outer hair cell-enriched, and inner hair cell-enriched. To demonstrate the feasibility of the method, we screened multiple reference genes in the sensory cell-enriched samples and identified stable genes in noise-traumatized cochleae. The method described here balances the need for both quality and purity of sensory cells and also circumvents many limitations of the currently available techniques for collecting cochlear tissues. With our approach, the collected samples can be used in diverse downstream analyses, including qRT-PCR, microarray, and RNA sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.