ArticleBMC health services research2013
Perspectives on the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation in health policy development in Uganda.
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing knowledge translation practices to accelerate change in adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health practice: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- A scoping review of knowledge translation in strengthening health policy and practice: sources, platforms, tools, opportunities, and challenges.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Development partner influence on domestic health financing contributions in Senegal: a mixed-methods case study.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Mobilizing stakeholders for implant removals in Burkina Faso using landscape assessment data.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers' experiences.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Article
- Learning needs assessment for multi-stakeholder implementation science training in LMIC settings: findings and recommendations.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Strengthening health policy development and management systems in low- and middle- income countries: South Africa's approach.Health policy OPEN · 2020Article
- Mind the gap: scaling up the utilization of insecticide treated mosquito nets using a knowledge translation model in Isingiro district, rural south western Uganda.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2020Article
- Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries.Health research policy and systems · 2020Review
- A scoping review of the uses and institutionalisation of knowledge for health policy in low- and middle-income countries.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Maximizing the potential of trauma registries in low-income and middle-income countries.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Review
- Multiple Perspectives Analysis of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Model for Older Adults in Quebec.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- The hepatitis C infection in Iran: a policy analysis of agenda-setting using Kingdon's multiple streams framework.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Assessing the influence of knowledge translation platforms on health system policy processes to achieve the health millennium development goals in Cameroon and Uganda: a comparative case study.Health policy and planning · 2018Article
- Knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis.Global health research and policy · 2018Review
- Practical lessons for bringing policy-makers on board in sexual and reproductive health research.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Policy dialogue to improve health outcomes in low income countries: what are the issues and way forward?BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Global Forum 2015 dialogue on "From evidence to policy - thinking outside the box": perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Evidence for informing health policy development in Low-income Countries (LICs): perspectives of policy actors in Uganda.International journal of health policy and management · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStakeholder roles in the application of evidence are influenced by context, the nature of the evidence, the policy development process, and stakeholder interactions. Past research has highlighted the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation (KT) without paying adequate attention to the peculiarities of low-income countries. Here we identify the roles, relations, and interactions among the key stakeholders involved in KT in Uganda and the challenges that they face.
methodsThis study employed qualitative approaches to examine the roles of and links among various stakeholders in KT. In-depth interviews were conducted with 21 key informants and focused on the key actors in KT, their perceived roles, and challenges.
resultsMajor stakeholders included civil society organizations with perceived roles of advocacy, community mobilization, and implementation. These stakeholders may ignore unconvincing evidence. The community's role was perceived as advocacy and participation in setting research priorities. The key role of the media was perceived as knowledge dissemination, but respondents noted that the media may misrepresent evidence if it is received in a poorly packaged form. The perceived roles of policy makers were evidence uptake, establishing platforms for KT and stewardship; negative roles included ignoring or even misrepresenting evidence that is not in their favor. The roles of parliamentarians were perceived as advocacy and community mobilization, but they were noted to pursue objectives that may not be supported by the evidence. The researchers' main role was defined as evidence generation, but focusing disproportionately on academic interests was cited as a concern. The donors' main role was defined as funding research and KT, but respondents were concerned about the local relevance of donor-supported research. Respondents reported that links among stakeholders were weak due to the absence of institutionalized, inclusive platforms. Challenges facing the stakeholders in the process of KT were identified.
conclusionsOur investigation revealed the need to consider the roles that various stakeholders are best placed to play. Links and necessary platforms must be put in place to achieve synergy in KT. Relevant capacities need to be built to overcome the challenges faced by the various stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.