ArticleBMC health services research2013
Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimising adherence to inpatient rehabilitation trial protocols: A mixed-methods systematic review.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion.European journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Guidelines for dementia or Parkinson's disease with depression or anxiety: a systematic review.BMC neurology · 2016Pooled it
- Determinants and strategies for implementing guideline-adherent physiotherapy: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Sexuality in the field of occupational therapy: A scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Specific interventions as part of a quality improvement collaborative enhance care for ischemic stroke patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
- Identifying Clinician Perspectives on Current Stroke Care Gaps Across the Care Continuum: An Ontario, Canada-Focused Study.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Clinician Perceptions of a Novel Multicomponent Digital Care Assistant and Support Program for People After Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CAPS) for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Why Aren't Antenatal Care Providers Adopting Oral Health Guidelines? A Qualitative Exploration.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Article
- The use of robotic upper limb therapy in routine clinical practice for stroke survivors: Insights from Australian therapists.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating an online stroke training programme for Saudi Arabian physiotherapists for improving their knowledge and confidence in long-term stroke care: a pilot mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring physiotherapists' knowledge and perception of exercise intensity in outpatient stroke rehabilitation: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Key elements of Goal-Directed Training for children with cerebral palsy: A qualitative content analysis.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- Understanding Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Confidence When Assessing for Spatial Neglect: A Special Issue Review.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2024Article
- Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Changing the channel: a qualitative analysis of an innovative video intervention to explore resident attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration on a Geriatric Medicine Unit.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranslating evidence into practice is an important final step in the process of evidence-based practice. Medical record audits can be used to examine how well practice compares with published evidence, and identify evidence-practice gaps. After providing audit feedback to professionals, local barriers to practice change can be identified and targetted with focussed behaviour change interventions. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations at one Australian stroke unit.
methodsA qualitative methodology was used. A sample of 28 allied health, nursing and medical professionals participated in a group or individual interview. These interviews occurred after staff had received audit feedback and identified areas for practice change. Questions focused on barriers and enablers to implementing guideline recommendations about management of: upper limb sensory impairments, mobility including sitting balance; vision; anxiety and depression; neglect; swallowing; communication; education for stroke survivors and carers; advice about return to work and driving. Qualitative data were analysed for themes using theoretical domains described by Michie and colleagues (2005).
resultsSix group and two individual interviews were conducted, involving six disciplines. Barriers were different across disciplines. The six key barriers identified were: (1) Beliefs about capabilities of individual professionals and their discipline, and about patient capabilities (2) Beliefs about the consequences, positive and negative, of implementing the recommendations (3) Memory of, and attention to, best practices (4) Knowledge and skills required to implement best practice; (5) Intention and motivation to implement best practice, and (6) Resources. Some barriers were also enablers to change. For example, occupational therapists required new knowledge and skills (a barrier), to better manage sensation and neglect impairments while physiotherapists generally knew how to implement best-practice mobility rehabilitation (an enabler).
conclusionsFindings add to current knowledge about barriers to change and implementation of multiple guideline recommendations. Major challenges included sexuality education and depression screening. Limited knowledge and skills was a common barrier. Knowledge about specific interventions was needed before implementation could commence, and to maintain treatment fidelity. The provision of detailed online intervention protocols and manuals may help clinicians to overcome the knowledge barrier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.