Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23956306›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Incorporating prior knowledge into Gene Network Study.

Zixing Wang, Wenlong Xu, F Anthony San Lucas, Yin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing Design of Genomics Studies for Clonal Evolution Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Probabilistic Graphical Models Applied to Biological Networks.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Gaussian and Mixed Graphical Models as (multi-)omics data analysis tools.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zixing WangDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Center and University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Wenlong Xu
F Anthony San Lucas
Yin Liu

Funding

Principles for Tuning Target Selectivity in Signaling ProteinsR01GM097553 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHEUNG, MARGARET SHUN · 2011 to 2022
$2.7M
Bayesian Methods in Signal Transduction Network AnalysisR01LM010022 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LIU, YIN · 2011 to 2014
$901k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097553NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationA major goal in genomic research is to identify genes that may jointly influence a biological response. From many years of intensive biomedical research, a large body of biological knowledge, or pathway information, has accumulated in available databases. There is a strong interest in leveraging these pathways to improve the statistical power and interpretability in studying gene networks associated with complex phenotypes. This prior information is a valuable complement to large-scale genomic data such as gene expression data generated from microarrays. However, it is a non-trivial task to effectively integrate available biological knowledge into gene expression data when reconstructing gene networks.

resultsIn this article, we developed and applied a Lasso method from a Bayesian perspective, a method we call prior Lasso (pLasso), for the reconstruction of gene networks. In this method, we partition edges between genes into two subsets: one subset of edges is present in known pathways, whereas the other has no prior information associated. Our method assigns different prior distributions to each subset according to a modified Bayesian information criterion that incorporates prior knowledge on both the network structure and the pathway information. Simulation studies have indicated that the method is more effective in recovering the underlying network than a traditional Lasso method that does not use the prior information. We applied pLasso to microarray gene expression datasets, where we used information from the Pathway Commons (PC) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) as prior information for the network reconstruction, and successfully identified network hub genes associated with clinical outcome in cancer patients. AVAILABILITY: The source code is available at http://nba.uth.tmc.edu/homepage/liu/pLasso.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksBayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansModels, GeneticOvarian NeoplasmsSoftware Design

Identifiers

PMID23956306
PMCPMC3789546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.