Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23956260›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2014

The dilemma of choosing the ideal permutation strategy while estimating statistical significance of genome-wide enrichment.

Subhajyoti De, Brent S Pedersen, Katerina Kechris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subhajyoti De
Brent S Pedersen
Katerina Kechris

Funding

The Cell-Of-Origin of Human CancersU54CA143798 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI MICHOR, FRANZISKA · 2009 to 2014
$11.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143798NCI NIH HHS U54CA143798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrative analyses of genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic features for human and various model organisms have revealed that many such features are nonrandomly distributed in the genome. Significant enrichment (or depletion) of genomic features is anticipated to be biologically important. Detection of genomic regions having enrichment of certain features and estimation of corresponding statistical significance rely on the expected null distribution generated by a permutation model. We discuss different genome-wide permutation approaches, present examples where the permutation strategy affects the null model and show that the confidence in estimating statistical significance of genome-wide enrichment might depend on the choice of the permutation approach. In those cases, where biologically relevant constraints are unclear, it is preferable to examine whether key conclusions are consistent, irrespective of the choice of the randomization strategy.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCCCTC-Binding FactorComputational BiologyDNAEpigenomicsGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsG-QuadruplexesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalRepressor ProteinsSoftwareCCCTC-Binding FactorCTCF protein, humanDNARepressor ProteinsSTAT2 protein, humanSTAT2 Transcription Factorgenome-wide enrichmentnull distributionpermutation strategystatistical significance

Identifiers

PMID23956260
PMCPMC4271068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.