ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2013
Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diseases: a Systematic review based on the efficacy model.BMC oral health · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative evaluation of direct and digital measurements of peri-implant defects using CBCT, ultrasound, and intraoral scanning.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- The effects of different implant crown restorative materials on the detection of proximal caries of adjacent teeth in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using various machines, metal artifact-reduction (MAR) algorithm, and exposure protocols.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Precision mapping of mandibular canal dimensions: cone beam computed tomography insights.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Efficacy of two radiographic algorithms for detection of peri-implant bone defects on cone-beam computed tomography scans.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Combination of metal artifact reduction and sharpening filter application for horizontal root fracture diagnosis in teeth adjacent to a zirconia implant.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- A conservative approach to localize loose implant screw through cemented crown: an in vitro experimental study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Performance of different cone-beam computed tomography scan modes with and without metal artifact reduction in detection of recurrent dental caries under various restorative materials.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Effect of auto-adaptive metal artifact reduction (aMAR) program in cone-beam computed tomography on assessing pre-implant bone levels.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2024Article
- Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Application of metal artifact reduction algorithm for CBCT diagnosis of temporary anchorage device-tooth root contact: inadequate to reduce false-positive rate.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review.Oral radiology · 2023Review
- Effect of metal artifact removal modes on the accuracy of linear measurement around titanium implants by applying different voltages: an original article.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified grayscale range for detection of buccal cortical plate defects adjacent to dental implants.Dental research journal · 2023Article
- The Effect of Changes in the Angular Position of Implants on Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Scoping Review.Radiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.Imaging science in dentistry · 2022Article
- Article
- Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?Head & face medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) images obtained with and without artefact reduction (AR) in detecting simulated buccal peri-implant and buccal periodontal defects.
methods42 implants inserted into edentulous mandibles, and 38 teeth present in dry mandibles were used. Simulated buccal peri-implant defects (n = 22) and buccal periodontal defects (n = 22) were prepared. 20 implants and 18 teeth without simulated defects were the control group. Images of the mandibles were obtained using a Planmeca ProMax(®) 3D Max CBCT unit (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Image reconstructions were prepared without and with low, medium and high AR modes. Images were viewed randomly by six observers twice for the presence of defects. Kappa coefficient was calculated. F2_LD_F1 design for non-parametric analysis of longitudinal data was used. Area under curves (AUCs) were calculated for each observer. Significance level was taken as α = 0.05.
resultsIntraobserver kappa ranged from 0.140 to 0.792 for peri-implant and from 0.189 to 1.0 for periodontal defects. All factors were statistically significant (p < 0.001), except for image mode and implant brand. Pairwise interactions were found between periodontal defects and peri-implant defects (p < 0.001), observers (p < 0.001), observer and image mode (p < 0.001), defect model and observer (p < 0.001) and defect model, image mode and observer (p = 0.04). AUC values ranged from 0.39 to 0.52 for peri-implant and from 0.45 to 0.71 for periodontal defects. Higher AUC values were found for periodontal defects than for peri-implant defects.
conclusionsBuccal peri-implant defects were more difficult to detect than buccal periodontal defects. No difference was found among CBCT images obtained with and without AR modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.