ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2013
Highly diverse protein library based on the ubiquitous (β/α)₈ enzyme fold yields well-structured proteins through in vitro folding selection.
Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- PacBio sequencing output increased through uniform and directional fivefold concatenation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- High throughput sequencing of in vitro selections of mRNA-displayed peptides: data analysis and applications.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020Review
- Review
- Extensive libraries of gene truncation variants generated by in vitro transposition.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Peptide aptamers: development and applications.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2015Review
- Advances in the directed evolution of proteins.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Proper protein folding is a prerequisite for protein stability and enzymatic activity. Although directed evolution can be a powerful tool to investigate enzymatic function and to isolate novel activities, well-designed libraries of folded proteins are essential. In vitro selection methods are particularly capable of searching for enzymatic activities in libraries of trillions of protein variants, yet high-quality libraries of well-folded enzymes with such high diversity are lacking. We describe the construction and detailed characterization of a folding-enriched protein library based on the ubiquitous (β/α)₈ barrel fold, which is found in five of the six enzyme classes. We introduced seven randomized loops on the catalytic face of the monomeric, thermostable (β/α)₈ barrel of glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (GDPD) from Thermotoga maritima. We employed in vitro folding selection based on protease digestion to enrich intermediate libraries containing three to four randomized loops for folded variants, and then combined them to assemble the final library (10¹⁴ DNA sequences). The resulting library was analyzed by using the in vitro protease assay and an in vivo GFP-folding assay; it contains ∼10¹² soluble monomeric protein variants. We isolated six library members and demonstrated that these proteins are soluble, monomeric and show (β/α)₈-barrel fold-like secondary and tertiary structure. The quality of the folding-enriched library improved up to 50-fold compared to a control library that was assembled without the folding selection. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first example of combining the ultra-high throughput mRNA display method with selection for folding. The resulting (β/α)₈ barrel libraries provide a valuable starting point to study the unique catalytic capabilities of the (β/α)₈ fold, and to isolate novel enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.