Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23955577›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2013

The quantification of body fluid allostasis during exercise.

Nicholas Tam, Timothy D Noakes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas TamUCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, 3rd Floor, Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Boundary Road, Newlands, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, nicholas.tam@uct.ac.za.
Timothy D Noakes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prescription of an optimal fluid intake during exercise has been a controversial subject in sports science for at least the past decade. Only recently have guidelines evolved from 'blanket' prescriptions to more individualised recommendations. Currently the American College of Sports Medicine advise that sufficient fluid should be ingested to ensure that body mass (BM) loss during exercise does not exceed >2 % of starting BM so that exercise-associated medical complications will be avoided. Historically, BM changes have been used as a surrogate for fluid loss during exercise. It would be helpful to accurately determine fluid shifts in the body in order to provide physiologically appropriate fluid intake advice. The measurement of total body water via D2O is the most accurate measure to detect changes in body fluid content; other methods, including bioelectrical impedance, are less accurate. Thus, the aim of this review is to convey the current understanding of body fluid allostasis during exercise when drinking according to the dictates of thirst (ad libitum). This review examines the basis for fluid intake prescription with the use of BM, the concepts of 'voluntary and involuntary dehydration' and the major routes by which the body gains and loses fluid during exercise.

Indexed as

AllostasisBody FluidsDehydrationExerciseFluid TherapyHumansWater-Electrolyte Balance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.