ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2013
The quantification of body fluid allostasis during exercise.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Relationship Between Bioimpedance Vector Displacement and Renal Function After a Marathon in Non-elite Runners.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Association Between aquaporin-1 and Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2019Review
- Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia in Endurance and Ultra-Endurance Performance-Aspects of Sex, Race Location, Ambient Temperature, Sports Discipline, and Length of Performance: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Review
- The availability of water associated with glycogen during dehydration: a reservoir or raindrop?European journal of applied physiology · 2018Article
- Testosterone responses to standardized short-term sub-maximal and maximal endurance exercises: issues on the dynamic adaptive role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prescription of an optimal fluid intake during exercise has been a controversial subject in sports science for at least the past decade. Only recently have guidelines evolved from 'blanket' prescriptions to more individualised recommendations. Currently the American College of Sports Medicine advise that sufficient fluid should be ingested to ensure that body mass (BM) loss during exercise does not exceed >2 % of starting BM so that exercise-associated medical complications will be avoided. Historically, BM changes have been used as a surrogate for fluid loss during exercise. It would be helpful to accurately determine fluid shifts in the body in order to provide physiologically appropriate fluid intake advice. The measurement of total body water via D2O is the most accurate measure to detect changes in body fluid content; other methods, including bioelectrical impedance, are less accurate. Thus, the aim of this review is to convey the current understanding of body fluid allostasis during exercise when drinking according to the dictates of thirst (ad libitum). This review examines the basis for fluid intake prescription with the use of BM, the concepts of 'voluntary and involuntary dehydration' and the major routes by which the body gains and loses fluid during exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23955577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.